ICD-10 defines Antisocial Personality Disorder as someone showing at least three of the following criteria:
There is no question that Sandeen clearly appears to meets criteria 1, 2, 4, 5, and 6. Not enough is known to conclusively state he might meet criteria 3.
- Callous unconcern for the feelings of others.
- Gross and persistent attitude of irresponsibility and disregard for social norms, rules, and obligations.
- Incapacity to maintain enduring relationships, though having no difficulty in establishing them.
- Very low tolerance to frustration and a low threshold for discharge of aggression, including violence.
- Incapacity to experience guilt or to profit from experience, particularly punishment.
- Markedly prone to blame others or to offer plausible rationalizations for the behavior that has brought the person into conflict with society.
Sandeen repeatedly ignores the fact that many do not wish to be lumped in with "transgender, and gender nonconforming people," and yet he continues to use the term "transgender, transsexual, and gender nonconforming people" as though they belong together. He also has shown little regard for people's feelings in a number of ways, including his cyberstalking of myself.
The second one pretty much speaks for itself. For example, Sandeen has claimed that his "legal change of gender" would allow him to legally marry a man, even though Sandeen still has his penis and is not remotely a female, or a woman.
Sandeen has exhibited, and bragged about violent acts against people who questioned his being a woman.
He shows no guilt for his actions against me, but is outraged that something for less serious was aimed at him.
And again, he is blaming others for objecting to his previous plan to commit would would, at the time, have been a legal fraud.
Sandeen was able to obtain a "legal change of gender" because transgender extremists have managed to con the state legislature into rewriting state law vaguely enough that there appears to be a legal loophole that would allow a physician to fraudulently imply that a patient has undergone sex reassignment when they actually have not, and more importantly for Sandeen, have disallowed challenges to such a claim.
This last is at the heart of Sandeen's complaint about being cyberbullied. He bragged online about how he planned to perpetuate such a fraud, and he objected when people discussed taking legal steps to prevent it. He then stated that he planned to wait until the new law was in effect, to avoid such a legal challenge.
Interesting...Sandeen attempts to do real harm, but thinks HE is being cyberstalked when someone discusses trying to prevent him from committing what would have been a crime. Well, of course that does certainly fit criteria 2 above.
So no, Sandeen is not remotely a woman, and never will be, but he clearly appears to meet the criteria for being a sociopath. Of course, I am not a licensed professional, and would not presume to make a diagnosis, but that is certainly how it appears to me.