Let me start off by saying that I have no objections to same-sex marriage. I have friends who are married to members of the same-sex, and I was even the photographer at one such wedding.
But, the law is the law, and "Autumn" Sandeen, who has taken advantage of a loophole in California law to perpetuate what is, effectively, a fraud, is making a claim that is, at best, untested, and is probably a complete load of crap. Sandeen, who is now claiming to be "legally female" claims that he can enter into a "heterosexual" marriage with a man. First off, either Sandeen has gone completely delusional, is completely ignorant, or is just plain dishonest. If Sandeen was able to find some poor fool willing to marry him, it would not be a heterosexual marriage (Sandeen still has a penis, and two people with penises do not a heterosexual couple make.) and I honestly wonder, if such a marriage occurred, if it would be remotely legal in California, or any other state that currently does not recognize same-sex marriages.
I mean seriously, does Sandeen really think a piece of paper changes anything? If he died, I seriously doubt his death certificate would record him as a female. If he is arrested, his piece of paper is not going get him a bunk in a women's prison. He is still a male, no matter what him, his delusions, or a judge in San Diego might say. And no, his piece of paper is not going to get him admission to women's only space.
Nope, Sandeen is still a male, and he is still a man. Even if he decides, at some future point, to go further and have full SRS, he will still be a man. You can't change the brain, and in Sandeen's case, that is 100% all-American male. No matter what he wants to claim.
About all Sandeen's silliness accomplishes is an increase in the possibility of backlash against transsexuals who actually are post-op.
Oh, and apparently kudos to Cathy Brennan, who it appears made an effort to talk some sense to the court, though sadly, she was unsuccessful.