In the latest chapter of the battle between women and the "men in dresses" crowd, Mr. "Autumn" Sandeen has come up with an even sillier post over on Transadvocate. In previous articles we have discussed his first post, in which he first made the claim that GallusMag has been "outed." In that article, we showed that, by his own standards, the claim was bogus. Mr. "Cristan" Williams, and Mr. "Dana" Taylor, yes, the "Milk-Man" himself, have claimed to have found out who GallusMag really is. And, they cling to this, at best, flimsy claim desperately. Mr. Sandeen has become point man for their position.
In this article, he attempts to back up that claim with some of the most laughable evidence ever presented. Now, keep in mind that what GallusMag has done is not, as Mr. Sandeen claims, "doxxing" which is "l33t-speak" for uncovering information on someone. What GallusMag has done is simply shine a light on some of the sillier things that men in dresses have put up on the Internet. Her sources are all quite public. She just exposes them to the ridicule they deserve. Her subject matter ranges from outright threats of violence, to men in dresses just acting silly. So, naturally, they hate her with a passion.
On the other hand, they have to claim she has been "doxxing" them to excuse their attempts to invade her privacy.
Mr. Sandeen's case is ridiculous. He refers to vague claims, that he declines to provide details of, and then proceeds to back those claims up with some rather hilarious "facts" that add up to nothing.
For example, he claims that GallusMag denied the claim too quickly and therefore it must be true. Of course, the fact of the matter is, what was actually denied was a claim by Mr. Williams that he had discovered that GallusMag was wealthy, and lives in a "luxurious home." That is what was denied. Once again, facts are twisted to make something appear to be different than it really is...
From there, it just gets even sillier. Someone found a MySpace page for the person who has been mis-identified as GallusMag. Mr. Sandeen makes a big deal out of the fact that this person, who is an artist, has a piece that depicts GallusMag. Now, considering that GallusMag is a historical figure, and well known in certain circles, that proves...well, nothing. But even sillier is an attempt to claim that the image depicts the artist as GallusMag. A rather silly claim, but presented as though it is conclusive.
The rest of the article, apparently the actual "facts" needed padding, consists of Mr. Sandeen critiquing the rest of this person's art. Which, of course, has no real bearing on the claims made. The funniest part is Mr. Sandeen's attempt to accuse a woman of objectifying women, in defense of so-called "transwomen" objectifying women. Of course, Mr. Sandeen, who is quite male in both body and mind, has no idea what he is blathering about.
The bottom line is, the men in dresses crowd is more obsessed with the idea that they have struck a blow against someone they violently hate, than with any concern for the truth. They have their "trophy," and they are not going to give it up without a fight.