This time, he has gone so far as to defend "Colleen" Francis, who exposed himself to a group of teenage girls at Evergreen College in Washington State. Perhaps defend is not the proper term. As is typical with Mr. Williams, he has confabulated a rather fanciful tale in a desperate attempt to deny what actually happened.
Mr. Williams is trying to claim that the whole affair is really all an "urban legend," by, well, trying to cook up an urban legend. I find it kind of interesting that Mr. Williams has waited over a year to come up with the bit of drivel. Apparently he thinks it has been long enough that people might actually believe his lies.
But the real question is why? Is it because, well, the "Colleen" Francis affair is so far-fetched that we should all believe that such a thing could never happen? Or is it because, well, if the transgender extremists like Mr. Williams have their way, things like this will become routine?
If you guessed the former, sorry, but you are wrong. If you guessed the latter, congratulations!
You see, very central to the REAL transgender agenda is an effort to force women to accept, shall we say, nude intact males in areas where there is an expectation of privacy. Put a bit less delicately, these, uh, "women" are supposed to be free to wave their, uh, neo-clits around. And if you don't like it? TOUGH! Just ask Transadvocate contributor Mr. "Zinnia" Jones:
"Cis people’s bathroom fears do not matter"
And then there is this outright lie from Mr. "Mara" Kiesling, in which he actually admits to the fact that part of the agenda is forcing women to accept nude men in the showers and dressing rooms:
The most significant change for transgender people is that we fought for and won removal of language that clarified use of showers and locker rooms "where being seen unclothed would be unavoidable." None of the states that have passed and successfully implemented a gender identity anti-discrimination law includes such a provision, and neither should ENDA.This is not true, as 11 of the 17 states with such laws have separate provisions that protect privacy in such areas. And as I showed in my previous post, this is a part of those schools policies that Mr. Williams has been lying and saying were "identical" to the new transgender school law that is currently being challenged in California. That law specifically leaves out any provision that would allow for such protections. It is important to remember that an omission can be as significant as an inclusion.
No, bottom line, this is the real transgender agenda. Mr. Williams wants you to believe that what happened at Evergreen College is a myth. He wants you to not demand protections until it is too late...
And I do appreciate Elizabeth at Notes From the T Side having the decency to acknowledge that I was right when I predicted that this would happen. As I said, I was not interested in attacking a young transsexual. I'm simply opposed to Mr. Williams and his ilk using a child to push their agenda.