Let's be clear here. This pervert in Washington state is not a pre-op transsexual. He has made clear that he has a penis, and he wants to keep it. And he loves showing it to teenage girls. He is a classic transvestite, who is turned on by the idea of being a "woman with a penis," and goes to the extreme of forcing his penis on others and then suggests that they should "just get over it." And, Williams, a fellow pervert, thinks that anyone who disagrees with this sickening behavior is "under a Klan Fallacy."
Now, let me remind people here of a common tactic of extremists. You compare your opponent to some great evil. If you are right wing, you call your enemy a "Communist." It doesn't matter if they have a connection to communism, or not. You just throw that accusation out there. The idea is they will be so embarrassed they will either fold, and go away, or be caught up in refuting the outrageous accusation. If you are left wing, you compare your enemy to the Nazis (also works for the right wing in some cases), or better yet, the Klan. And that is the dishonest tactic that Mr. Williams has resorted to in his desperation.
Now, here is a man, who claims to be a woman, attacking women, for not wanting to have a man, with a penis, who claims to be a woman, forcing that penis on them. Pervert Francis is engaged in the same basic sort of violence against women that rapist engage in...using his penis as a weapon. Williams, a man, is defending this behavior. What Mr. Francis is doing is an act of violence, albeit a bit less than an outright rape, buy still an act of violence. Just like a "flasher," he is imposing his penis on women. And Mr. Williams, thinks this is just fine, and anyone who doesn't see it their way is a member of the Klan.
Now, in defense, yes, I said defense, of RAPISTS, yes I said RAPISTS, Mr. Williams offers thirty, count them, thirty examples of women who have engaged, according to Mr. Williams, in rape. This is supposed to "prove" that men are no more of a danger to women than,
Thirty women, compared to how many hundreds, even thousands of men? Yes, one can find examples of anything. I could, no doubt, easily find thirty transvestites who are guilty of any crime, and claim that proves that transvestites are a danger. Shoot, I would be I could find more, say, 300. I could find some arbitrary number of any group, and claim it proves something, and like Mr. Williams, I would be intellectually dishonest.
The fact is, rapists, exhibitionists, child molesters, and such tend to be men. For those thirty women, I would venture that there are thousands of men guilty of rape. Does this mean that all transvestites are rapists? No, of course not. Does this mean that all men are rapists? No, how absurd! Does this mean that women have every right to be uneasy at the presence, of an obvious man, in a place where women have good reason to expect to feel relatively secure, and free from the presence of men? Yes, absolutely. Does Mr. Williams, a man, with no real evidence of actually having a feminized brain remotely understand this? Not remotely. He is "transgender" and he thinks as a transgender, he is above women. They should bow to his demands...
Cooke, I suspect, is more a classic bigot. She has a hatred, an irrational hatred, of a certain class of people, and that clouds her thinking. But Williams goes beyond this. Williams tries to claim that a woman being uncomfortable with the presence of a man in a women's room is comparable to a white woman being uncomfortable with a black woman in the women's room. Now, this might seem, to some, on face value to be a valid argument. It is, however, both dishonest, and without any basis in reality. Being a particular race is based strictly, without question, on genetics. While is it possible, in theory, to alter one's skin tone to appear darker, and even to undergo cosmetic surgery to appear to be another race, this is a bit extreme. But any man can, if it suits him, simply dress as a woman. And for a significant number of men, this is basically what happens. Put another way, we are discussing something reasonably assumed to be congenital and unalterable, with something it is equally reasonable to assume is simply chosen behavior.
Perverts like Mr. Francis, and Mr. Williams choose to behave as they do. A woman who is black, or Asian, or even white, did not likely make a choice. A man, choosing to engage in a certain behavior, such as Mr. Francis, or Mr. Williams, should not be automatically allowed to force himself on women. But, Mr. Williams says if you don't think they should be able to, you are a victim of the "Klan fallacy."
Mr. Williams, simply put, is full of crap. Laughably, absurdly, and totally, full of crap. Seriously, if you take his arguments seriously, you are an idiot. End of story. This is comparable to people who claim that perpetual motion exists, but the government is covering it up. This is comparable to people who claim to have solved some unsolvable math problem. Williams, is, well, a bad joke, and the sad thing is, he is not alone.
Oh, and I am going to call it.... By invoking the Klan, Mr. Williams has, effectively, committed a technical violation of Godwin's Law, and has, simply put, lost the argument on that basis alone. So, the fact that he is a total moron is somewhat irrelevant.