Well, my long term cyber-stalker, "Diane" Lask has upped his game. He sent me another anonymous message, this time including a more overt threat. I guess it will have to have a talk with the San Francisco Police Department sooner, rather than later. Apparently Lask has taken complete leave of his senses. His first message was enough to qualify as threatening, and will like result in his being investigated for stalking. This one, well it will cinch such a case. He really must be aching to be some hunky prisoner's date. Remember, Lask is apparently non-op, and thus would end up in with men, not women. I'm sure he will be very popular.
Showing posts with label cyberstalking. Show all posts
Showing posts with label cyberstalking. Show all posts
Friday, December 12, 2014
Wednesday, December 10, 2014
A Somewhat Scary Email
Well, it appears that David Lask, who calls himself Diane Lask, the obsessive stalker who has been harassing me for years, is up to his old tricks. Now, he has sent me an email in which he makes it clear that he knows my current address, claims he knows my phone number (he mentions my carrier), and then proceeds, in his typical style, to make his usual round of lies. He has little idea of what he is talking about.
I am pretty sure it is Lask, because he again makes the claim of having a Corvette (he claimed this before, and it turned out to be a lie).
Sorry, but my relationships with my daughter is just fine...unlike some people who are writing about how they are so depressed this time of the year. I am considering a trip back to visit my daughter and grandchildren next year, so the claim that "you will never see your grandchildren" is also bogus. And, as he should be aware, I am clearly not homeless.
Oh, and as to my relation with God, well he is wrong about that as well.
Of course, this could be someone impersonating Lask, but given the nature of the message, I think contacting the police, and filing charges will be appropriate. A message such as this carries implied threats, and would certainly fall under laws against stalking. I do believe he has gone a bit too far. And, well, depending on the anonymous server he used, he may, or may not, be easy to trace.
Oh, and for those who may not remember, or who may be new to this blog, Mr. Lask is the kook who terrorized people on alt.support.srs for years. He harassed anyone he considered unworthy. The ironic part was, Lask turned out to be a classic transgender, non-op, having had a history of being a member of a group that was pretty much a local variant of the Tri-Ess type cross dresser's club in San Francisco. His best friend, who died at his keyboard was a guy who called himself "Cheryl Mullins." That person, who also lied about being a post-op, turned out to be an intact male.
I am pretty sure it is Lask, because he again makes the claim of having a Corvette (he claimed this before, and it turned out to be a lie).
Sorry, but my relationships with my daughter is just fine...unlike some people who are writing about how they are so depressed this time of the year. I am considering a trip back to visit my daughter and grandchildren next year, so the claim that "you will never see your grandchildren" is also bogus. And, as he should be aware, I am clearly not homeless.
Oh, and as to my relation with God, well he is wrong about that as well.
Of course, this could be someone impersonating Lask, but given the nature of the message, I think contacting the police, and filing charges will be appropriate. A message such as this carries implied threats, and would certainly fall under laws against stalking. I do believe he has gone a bit too far. And, well, depending on the anonymous server he used, he may, or may not, be easy to trace.
Oh, and for those who may not remember, or who may be new to this blog, Mr. Lask is the kook who terrorized people on alt.support.srs for years. He harassed anyone he considered unworthy. The ironic part was, Lask turned out to be a classic transgender, non-op, having had a history of being a member of a group that was pretty much a local variant of the Tri-Ess type cross dresser's club in San Francisco. His best friend, who died at his keyboard was a guy who called himself "Cheryl Mullins." That person, who also lied about being a post-op, turned out to be an intact male.
Friday, October 31, 2014
Oh MY! The Men in Dresses Are Having a Hissy Fit!!!!
Since I basically shredded Mr. "Autumn" Sandeen's puff pieces in support of Mr. "Cristan" Williams', and Mr. "Dana" Taylor's claims that they have uncovered the true name of GallusMag, they have been frantic. I have been subjected to regular cyberstalking on Twitter, by those three, the comments on Mr. Sandeen's column at LGBT Weekly have been removed, and in general they are beside themselves with anger and hate.
The cyberstalking on Twitter has ranged from the hilarious (Mr. Taylor's remark about my blog getting no comments...perhaps he hasn't noticed that the same is true for most of the latest drivel at Transadvocate) to the downright hateful (Mr. Sandeen has again tried to drag my daughter into this). This is nothing new, and before, Mr. Taylor was heavily involved. When all this started a bit over a year ago, my daughter was very upset at what these creeps were up to. Of course, they could care less about how some mere woman feels. They have shown that, time and time again.
Again, they have taken a comment that my daughter made at a time when we were estranged. What caused this is really none of their business, and I refuse to violate my daughter's privacy. Simply put, we have a disagreement, and we did not speak for a while. Then, she contacted me, and we patched things up. End of story. Contrary to some of the crap they have tried to read into this, we are very close. I speak to her regularly on the phone, and since that time, I have visited her, and my grandchildren a number of times. I am also, contrary to some rather outrageous claims, on good terms with my ex.
As to the rest of their claims, they have made quite a bit out of stuff they have no capacity to understand. As I have pointed out many times, none of these three are transsexuals (well, Mr. Williams is a possible exception, having possibly become what would be, effectively an FTM). All three are basically fetishistic crossdressers who have crossed over to full time.
The stuff my daughter made reference to, again at a time when she was angry with me, was from the time before I made my transition. I was, quite frankly, non-functional as a "man." Yes, my ex supported us. When you are basically living a lie, it can be hard to keep a job. Like other transsexuals, I had to basically create a false shell to hide inside of. That was true from childhood. I remember having to pretend to care about things I was expected to like, and having to hide what I really wanted. For example, I learned to tell people that my favorite baseball player was Roger Maris. Now, I could not have told anyone what position he played, any thing about his record, or probably even what team he played for. But, I could simply give that as an answer to a common question, and people were satisfied. In truth, I hated sports, and considered them a nuisance because they kept me from getting to watch what I wanted on TV.
I also learned that being honest about other interests would, at best, cause me to be mocked by my peers, and my father, and at worst could result in my suffering abuse. When I was in elementary school, I regularly hid what I really wanted, or felt, because otherwise, I would have received regular beatings for being a sissy. Actually, on more than one occasion, I got them anyway. On rare occasions, when I trusted someone, I usually found it to be a mistake.
These three clowns understand none of this. They had no problems being men. Mr. Sandeen, for example, served for TWENTY years in the U.S. Navy, as a man, without any real problems. Truth be told, I would not have lasted 20 days. Now, I know, some will argue that many women serve in the Navy, and this is quite true. But, they are serving as women, and what they go through is radically different. Of course, I doubt Mr. Sandeen can even comprehend something like that.
Likewise, Mr. Taylor had a relatively successful career as a man, as did Mr. Williams. In fact, a photo of Mr. Williams in a full beard was recently published on Gender Identity Watch. I find that rather interesting, since when I hit puberty, I rather obsessively tried to hide the fact that I was sprouting facial hair, and tweezed them out until there was too many, and then secretly shaved to avoid having to go through the time-honored ritual of having my father teach me to shave. In fact, my parents were rather puzzled that I didn't seem to shave even after I was married. And I could never, ever, imagine actually growing a beard or even a mustache.
No, before I transitioned, I was not a very pleasant person to be around. I was often very angry at the world, and suffered from depression, and self-hatred. Unlike these three, who seem to have had no problem being men, and still don't. And they have no idea what actually being a transsexual actually is...though they still keep trying to claim that transsexual, and transgender men like them, are really all the same.
The cyberstalking on Twitter has ranged from the hilarious (Mr. Taylor's remark about my blog getting no comments...perhaps he hasn't noticed that the same is true for most of the latest drivel at Transadvocate) to the downright hateful (Mr. Sandeen has again tried to drag my daughter into this). This is nothing new, and before, Mr. Taylor was heavily involved. When all this started a bit over a year ago, my daughter was very upset at what these creeps were up to. Of course, they could care less about how some mere woman feels. They have shown that, time and time again.
Again, they have taken a comment that my daughter made at a time when we were estranged. What caused this is really none of their business, and I refuse to violate my daughter's privacy. Simply put, we have a disagreement, and we did not speak for a while. Then, she contacted me, and we patched things up. End of story. Contrary to some of the crap they have tried to read into this, we are very close. I speak to her regularly on the phone, and since that time, I have visited her, and my grandchildren a number of times. I am also, contrary to some rather outrageous claims, on good terms with my ex.
As to the rest of their claims, they have made quite a bit out of stuff they have no capacity to understand. As I have pointed out many times, none of these three are transsexuals (well, Mr. Williams is a possible exception, having possibly become what would be, effectively an FTM). All three are basically fetishistic crossdressers who have crossed over to full time.
The stuff my daughter made reference to, again at a time when she was angry with me, was from the time before I made my transition. I was, quite frankly, non-functional as a "man." Yes, my ex supported us. When you are basically living a lie, it can be hard to keep a job. Like other transsexuals, I had to basically create a false shell to hide inside of. That was true from childhood. I remember having to pretend to care about things I was expected to like, and having to hide what I really wanted. For example, I learned to tell people that my favorite baseball player was Roger Maris. Now, I could not have told anyone what position he played, any thing about his record, or probably even what team he played for. But, I could simply give that as an answer to a common question, and people were satisfied. In truth, I hated sports, and considered them a nuisance because they kept me from getting to watch what I wanted on TV.
I also learned that being honest about other interests would, at best, cause me to be mocked by my peers, and my father, and at worst could result in my suffering abuse. When I was in elementary school, I regularly hid what I really wanted, or felt, because otherwise, I would have received regular beatings for being a sissy. Actually, on more than one occasion, I got them anyway. On rare occasions, when I trusted someone, I usually found it to be a mistake.
These three clowns understand none of this. They had no problems being men. Mr. Sandeen, for example, served for TWENTY years in the U.S. Navy, as a man, without any real problems. Truth be told, I would not have lasted 20 days. Now, I know, some will argue that many women serve in the Navy, and this is quite true. But, they are serving as women, and what they go through is radically different. Of course, I doubt Mr. Sandeen can even comprehend something like that.
Likewise, Mr. Taylor had a relatively successful career as a man, as did Mr. Williams. In fact, a photo of Mr. Williams in a full beard was recently published on Gender Identity Watch. I find that rather interesting, since when I hit puberty, I rather obsessively tried to hide the fact that I was sprouting facial hair, and tweezed them out until there was too many, and then secretly shaved to avoid having to go through the time-honored ritual of having my father teach me to shave. In fact, my parents were rather puzzled that I didn't seem to shave even after I was married. And I could never, ever, imagine actually growing a beard or even a mustache.
No, before I transitioned, I was not a very pleasant person to be around. I was often very angry at the world, and suffered from depression, and self-hatred. Unlike these three, who seem to have had no problem being men, and still don't. And they have no idea what actually being a transsexual actually is...though they still keep trying to claim that transsexual, and transgender men like them, are really all the same.
Wednesday, October 29, 2014
How Much Sillier Can Mr. "Autumn" Sandeen Get?
In the latest chapter of the battle between women and the "men in dresses" crowd, Mr. "Autumn" Sandeen has come up with an even sillier post over on Transadvocate. In previous articles we have discussed his first post, in which he first made the claim that GallusMag has been "outed." In that article, we showed that, by his own standards, the claim was bogus. Mr. "Cristan" Williams, and Mr. "Dana" Taylor, yes, the "Milk-Man" himself, have claimed to have found out who GallusMag really is. And, they cling to this, at best, flimsy claim desperately. Mr. Sandeen has become point man for their position.
In this article, he attempts to back up that claim with some of the most laughable evidence ever presented. Now, keep in mind that what GallusMag has done is not, as Mr. Sandeen claims, "doxxing" which is "l33t-speak" for uncovering information on someone. What GallusMag has done is simply shine a light on some of the sillier things that men in dresses have put up on the Internet. Her sources are all quite public. She just exposes them to the ridicule they deserve. Her subject matter ranges from outright threats of violence, to men in dresses just acting silly. So, naturally, they hate her with a passion.
On the other hand, they have to claim she has been "doxxing" them to excuse their attempts to invade her privacy.
Mr. Sandeen's case is ridiculous. He refers to vague claims, that he declines to provide details of, and then proceeds to back those claims up with some rather hilarious "facts" that add up to nothing.
For example, he claims that GallusMag denied the claim too quickly and therefore it must be true. Of course, the fact of the matter is, what was actually denied was a claim by Mr. Williams that he had discovered that GallusMag was wealthy, and lives in a "luxurious home." That is what was denied. Once again, facts are twisted to make something appear to be different than it really is...
From there, it just gets even sillier. Someone found a MySpace page for the person who has been mis-identified as GallusMag. Mr. Sandeen makes a big deal out of the fact that this person, who is an artist, has a piece that depicts GallusMag. Now, considering that GallusMag is a historical figure, and well known in certain circles, that proves...well, nothing. But even sillier is an attempt to claim that the image depicts the artist as GallusMag. A rather silly claim, but presented as though it is conclusive.
The rest of the article, apparently the actual "facts" needed padding, consists of Mr. Sandeen critiquing the rest of this person's art. Which, of course, has no real bearing on the claims made. The funniest part is Mr. Sandeen's attempt to accuse a woman of objectifying women, in defense of so-called "transwomen" objectifying women. Of course, Mr. Sandeen, who is quite male in both body and mind, has no idea what he is blathering about.
The bottom line is, the men in dresses crowd is more obsessed with the idea that they have struck a blow against someone they violently hate, than with any concern for the truth. They have their "trophy," and they are not going to give it up without a fight.
In this article, he attempts to back up that claim with some of the most laughable evidence ever presented. Now, keep in mind that what GallusMag has done is not, as Mr. Sandeen claims, "doxxing" which is "l33t-speak" for uncovering information on someone. What GallusMag has done is simply shine a light on some of the sillier things that men in dresses have put up on the Internet. Her sources are all quite public. She just exposes them to the ridicule they deserve. Her subject matter ranges from outright threats of violence, to men in dresses just acting silly. So, naturally, they hate her with a passion.
On the other hand, they have to claim she has been "doxxing" them to excuse their attempts to invade her privacy.
Mr. Sandeen's case is ridiculous. He refers to vague claims, that he declines to provide details of, and then proceeds to back those claims up with some rather hilarious "facts" that add up to nothing.
For example, he claims that GallusMag denied the claim too quickly and therefore it must be true. Of course, the fact of the matter is, what was actually denied was a claim by Mr. Williams that he had discovered that GallusMag was wealthy, and lives in a "luxurious home." That is what was denied. Once again, facts are twisted to make something appear to be different than it really is...
From there, it just gets even sillier. Someone found a MySpace page for the person who has been mis-identified as GallusMag. Mr. Sandeen makes a big deal out of the fact that this person, who is an artist, has a piece that depicts GallusMag. Now, considering that GallusMag is a historical figure, and well known in certain circles, that proves...well, nothing. But even sillier is an attempt to claim that the image depicts the artist as GallusMag. A rather silly claim, but presented as though it is conclusive.
The rest of the article, apparently the actual "facts" needed padding, consists of Mr. Sandeen critiquing the rest of this person's art. Which, of course, has no real bearing on the claims made. The funniest part is Mr. Sandeen's attempt to accuse a woman of objectifying women, in defense of so-called "transwomen" objectifying women. Of course, Mr. Sandeen, who is quite male in both body and mind, has no idea what he is blathering about.
The bottom line is, the men in dresses crowd is more obsessed with the idea that they have struck a blow against someone they violently hate, than with any concern for the truth. They have their "trophy," and they are not going to give it up without a fight.
Sunday, March 9, 2014
When Obsessive Cyberstalkers Unite
Truth be told, the gang at Shame On You Transgender Edition has basically switched over from bloggers to cyberstalkers and have joined forces with Mr. "Diane" Lask, who has been obsessed with me for some time. Ms. "Mark" Cummings slipped up and revealed this when he mentioned that someone had sent him the current set of photos he has posted. These photos are from a collection that Lask assembled some time back, and which he likes to trot out.
Now, I have written about Mr. Lask in the case, including the warning that anyone encountering this person should tread cautiously. Lask stalked a person from Canada for years, tormenting him at every opportunity, simply because they had a disagreement on Fidonet years ago. Lask was still going after him as recently as two or three years ago even though that person had actually fled the Internet to escape Lask.
Now, clearly, the truth hurts, and Ms. Cummings and her husband, "Jessica" are feeling a lot of pain. Ms. Cummings tries to claim I am obsessed with them. Yes, I admit, I have posted quite a bit on them. This is a blog that deals, among other things, with the idiocy of transgender extremists. And lately, they have been a primary example of this. Granted, a somewhat obscure example that its creators want to imagine is more a factor than it really is, but still, a perfect example of the genre. Other blogs have been relatively quiet.
I mean, really, why wouldn't I write about their ridiculous garbage? They went totally ballistic because I simply pointed out that I do not identify as "transgender." I haven't seen such a complete overreaction in some time. The results have been hilarious.
I admit, I can be harsh. I don't mince words. But at the core of everything I write is logical and objective arguments. What do they have? The same tired lies from an obsessive cyberstalker who, quite fortunately, has nothing new to offer….
Ten years ago, Lask and I met, when I offered him the opportunity to sleep on my floor for a few days when he was, quite literally, homeless. I was living, at the time, in an SRO, because I was trying to get back on my feet after a relationship ended, and I chose to move to San Francisco to start over. Lask, it turned out, had been homeless for years. I have suspicions of how that came to be, and I suspect it might have involved some improper behavior when he was working in Nevada, but that is just speculation.
Some time after that, when Lask became angry with me because I would not comply with a request of his, he began targeting me. At first, I thought it was someone else, but then Lask made some comments that let me know it was him. Simply put, he said some things that only he would have known to say. I don't appreciate betrayal, especially when it involves lies added on to truth. The game was on.
Now, one of the stunts Mr. Lask has pulled for years, is to post photos from an unfortunate article published in the SF Weekly about the SRO I lived in. That article was, well, a rather odd piece of journalism that still puzzles me a bit. While the place I lived was not perfect, it was also nothing like the article described. In fact, parts of the article, rather bizarrely included accusations apparently made by the organization that operated the building, They were fighting with the person they hired to manage the building and in an attempt to fire him (he was protected by a union) they made false claims about him being a member of a gang, and some other silliness. He eventually ended up receiving quite a bit of money from them in a settlement.
The photos in the article, which are supposedly rooms in the building, are often presented as showing my room. Nope. To be honest, I'm not sure whose room they show, or if they are even from the building where I lived. The room where I lived looked quite different. Then again, the place described in the article seemed quite far removed from what I experienced there as well. I never, for example, saw people lined up to buy drugs. I have no doubt that drugs were used by some residents. Shoot, this is San Francisco. I don't care where you live, chances are good, that at least some of your neighbors are using some sort of recreational drug. The question is not if, but what…
But, times change… I no longer live there. Mr. Lask has no idea where I live now. He has lost track of me. He has only his old lies that he keep repeating every chance he gets, rather obsessively. He has created an entire fantasy life for me that has little resemblance to reality. If he does know anything current, he has the good sense to keep quiet about it, as revealing it might prove a bit costly. Stalking is a crime, and if he has current information, it would certainly lead to charges.
Mr. Lask also has some photos, including one he doctored up, from an even I attended. I did not want my photo taken, and mugged at the camera a couple of times. Not photos I would choose to have published, but one which show, as one person said, "A middle aged woman, enjoying herself." But, hey, the tactic is simple. Publish a photo, and make fun of it. People see what they want to see. Mr. "Jessica" Cummings makes a snarky, and rather bizarre comment about "pigtails." Which is kind of weird, since I have NEVER worn my hair in that style, and am not in any of the photos. He also makes some remark about me being 59 at the time. Nope, not even close. But, I guess Mr. Cummings finds ageism funny, even if it is imaginary.
Ms. Cummings and her husband apparently don't like having the truth exposed. I do find it very telling that they offer nothing in the way of rational argument. They can't counter the actual arguments I make. When their "investigative reporters" try to, they wind up falling back on an argument that amounts to "You disagree with me. So, that means you are spewing… Hate. Transphobia. Hate. Transphobia." Talk about a broken record. They can't defend their absurd positions, and they have to resort to truly lame cyberstalking tactics. They are typical transgender poseurs, and they simply repeat the same crap they have learned from other transgender poseurs. Granted, it is easier to just repeat the same mantra than to actually stop and examine their lives and deal with real issues. If they did, they might realize that they are making a mistake, and seek help getting their lives back on track.
A hint people: Building your entire life on crossdressing fantasies does not work. Eventually the fad will run out, and people will get tired of pandering to your fantasies, and you will have to face reality. And it won't be pleasant.
Now, I have written about Mr. Lask in the case, including the warning that anyone encountering this person should tread cautiously. Lask stalked a person from Canada for years, tormenting him at every opportunity, simply because they had a disagreement on Fidonet years ago. Lask was still going after him as recently as two or three years ago even though that person had actually fled the Internet to escape Lask.
Now, clearly, the truth hurts, and Ms. Cummings and her husband, "Jessica" are feeling a lot of pain. Ms. Cummings tries to claim I am obsessed with them. Yes, I admit, I have posted quite a bit on them. This is a blog that deals, among other things, with the idiocy of transgender extremists. And lately, they have been a primary example of this. Granted, a somewhat obscure example that its creators want to imagine is more a factor than it really is, but still, a perfect example of the genre. Other blogs have been relatively quiet.
I mean, really, why wouldn't I write about their ridiculous garbage? They went totally ballistic because I simply pointed out that I do not identify as "transgender." I haven't seen such a complete overreaction in some time. The results have been hilarious.
I admit, I can be harsh. I don't mince words. But at the core of everything I write is logical and objective arguments. What do they have? The same tired lies from an obsessive cyberstalker who, quite fortunately, has nothing new to offer….
Ten years ago, Lask and I met, when I offered him the opportunity to sleep on my floor for a few days when he was, quite literally, homeless. I was living, at the time, in an SRO, because I was trying to get back on my feet after a relationship ended, and I chose to move to San Francisco to start over. Lask, it turned out, had been homeless for years. I have suspicions of how that came to be, and I suspect it might have involved some improper behavior when he was working in Nevada, but that is just speculation.
Some time after that, when Lask became angry with me because I would not comply with a request of his, he began targeting me. At first, I thought it was someone else, but then Lask made some comments that let me know it was him. Simply put, he said some things that only he would have known to say. I don't appreciate betrayal, especially when it involves lies added on to truth. The game was on.
Now, one of the stunts Mr. Lask has pulled for years, is to post photos from an unfortunate article published in the SF Weekly about the SRO I lived in. That article was, well, a rather odd piece of journalism that still puzzles me a bit. While the place I lived was not perfect, it was also nothing like the article described. In fact, parts of the article, rather bizarrely included accusations apparently made by the organization that operated the building, They were fighting with the person they hired to manage the building and in an attempt to fire him (he was protected by a union) they made false claims about him being a member of a gang, and some other silliness. He eventually ended up receiving quite a bit of money from them in a settlement.
The photos in the article, which are supposedly rooms in the building, are often presented as showing my room. Nope. To be honest, I'm not sure whose room they show, or if they are even from the building where I lived. The room where I lived looked quite different. Then again, the place described in the article seemed quite far removed from what I experienced there as well. I never, for example, saw people lined up to buy drugs. I have no doubt that drugs were used by some residents. Shoot, this is San Francisco. I don't care where you live, chances are good, that at least some of your neighbors are using some sort of recreational drug. The question is not if, but what…
But, times change… I no longer live there. Mr. Lask has no idea where I live now. He has lost track of me. He has only his old lies that he keep repeating every chance he gets, rather obsessively. He has created an entire fantasy life for me that has little resemblance to reality. If he does know anything current, he has the good sense to keep quiet about it, as revealing it might prove a bit costly. Stalking is a crime, and if he has current information, it would certainly lead to charges.
Mr. Lask also has some photos, including one he doctored up, from an even I attended. I did not want my photo taken, and mugged at the camera a couple of times. Not photos I would choose to have published, but one which show, as one person said, "A middle aged woman, enjoying herself." But, hey, the tactic is simple. Publish a photo, and make fun of it. People see what they want to see. Mr. "Jessica" Cummings makes a snarky, and rather bizarre comment about "pigtails." Which is kind of weird, since I have NEVER worn my hair in that style, and am not in any of the photos. He also makes some remark about me being 59 at the time. Nope, not even close. But, I guess Mr. Cummings finds ageism funny, even if it is imaginary.
Ms. Cummings and her husband apparently don't like having the truth exposed. I do find it very telling that they offer nothing in the way of rational argument. They can't counter the actual arguments I make. When their "investigative reporters" try to, they wind up falling back on an argument that amounts to "You disagree with me. So, that means you are spewing… Hate. Transphobia. Hate. Transphobia." Talk about a broken record. They can't defend their absurd positions, and they have to resort to truly lame cyberstalking tactics. They are typical transgender poseurs, and they simply repeat the same crap they have learned from other transgender poseurs. Granted, it is easier to just repeat the same mantra than to actually stop and examine their lives and deal with real issues. If they did, they might realize that they are making a mistake, and seek help getting their lives back on track.
A hint people: Building your entire life on crossdressing fantasies does not work. Eventually the fad will run out, and people will get tired of pandering to your fantasies, and you will have to face reality. And it won't be pleasant.
Sunday, March 2, 2014
Creative Writing….
Well, it appears that Mr. "Diane" Lask is back at it…posting more lies, this time on the Shame on You Transgender Blog. I do declare, Mr. Lask just can't help himself. After Lyle Blake, formerly known as Laura Blake disappeared from the Internet, poor Mr. Lask had no one to stalk. So, he turns on me again.
Of course, it is now no secret that this kook is a non-op, who spent years lying about being post-op along with his fellow non-op Cheryl Mullins. Together, with some others, they basically monopolized alt.support.srs for years.
Now, every time Mr. Lask starts up, his stories grow more and more exaggerated. My age increases, my weight goes up (I've actually lost some in recent years), I get poorer (even though Lask knows nothing of my actual economic situation, my life grows lonelier (he hasn't a clue about that either, etc.
On every "fact" he posts, he is basically wrong.
For example, I am not 62+, I am not in a "Standing Room Only (SRO) homeless shelter" (huh? Does he even make up terms?) and I am not remotely homeless, and in fact, Lask has no idea where I live now. I am not on SSI or "welfare." My income is not less than $800 a month. I am not 6'+ (I am actually the same height as Princess Diana was.) And I have a good relationship with my daughter. Mr. Lask, in his efforts to stalk me, also invaded my daughter's privacy. Her and I had some issues 10 years ago, but worked those out quite some time ago. But, in Mr. Lask's warped imagination, nothing ever changes.
But hey, again, if you happen to be looking for information on Diane Lask, and you come across this through Google, be warned…if this is the same Diane Lask, who will probably claim history as being involved in computers, and having sold vacuums for Sears, who lived in Nevada for some years…and who has a history living and working in the San Francisco Bay Area and Los Angeles, be very careful. This person is severely mentally ill, and has, as I point out, a history of stalking people online, and possibly in person.
Of course, it is now no secret that this kook is a non-op, who spent years lying about being post-op along with his fellow non-op Cheryl Mullins. Together, with some others, they basically monopolized alt.support.srs for years.
Now, every time Mr. Lask starts up, his stories grow more and more exaggerated. My age increases, my weight goes up (I've actually lost some in recent years), I get poorer (even though Lask knows nothing of my actual economic situation, my life grows lonelier (he hasn't a clue about that either, etc.
On every "fact" he posts, he is basically wrong.
For example, I am not 62+, I am not in a "Standing Room Only (SRO) homeless shelter" (huh? Does he even make up terms?) and I am not remotely homeless, and in fact, Lask has no idea where I live now. I am not on SSI or "welfare." My income is not less than $800 a month. I am not 6'+ (I am actually the same height as Princess Diana was.) And I have a good relationship with my daughter. Mr. Lask, in his efforts to stalk me, also invaded my daughter's privacy. Her and I had some issues 10 years ago, but worked those out quite some time ago. But, in Mr. Lask's warped imagination, nothing ever changes.
But hey, again, if you happen to be looking for information on Diane Lask, and you come across this through Google, be warned…if this is the same Diane Lask, who will probably claim history as being involved in computers, and having sold vacuums for Sears, who lived in Nevada for some years…and who has a history living and working in the San Francisco Bay Area and Los Angeles, be very careful. This person is severely mentally ill, and has, as I point out, a history of stalking people online, and possibly in person.
Friday, February 28, 2014
End Game
After wasting far too much time, the curtain has come down, at least for the moment, on the gang of extremists I have been tangling with. The whole thing began when I responded to a post on a relatively new blog aimed at "shaming" transgender people back into line. The blog was started by a couple of massive egos that are the strangest pair of kooks I have encountered in some time. Mr. "Jessica Lynn" Cummings is a classic non-op autogynephilic type who met a egotistical FTM equivalent, Ms. "Mark Angelo" Cummings. And they decide to become a couple. Now, this is not really new, FTM/MTF couples, while rare, are not unheard of. I remember one being featured on the TV show "That's Incredible" many years ago. But this one is particularly strange, because both are pretty much classic "transgender extremists," making a big deal out of being non-op. Mr. Cummings still has his penis, so he and his wife, "Mark" can have intercourse in the usual way….I am sure Blanchard and Bailey would have a field day with this one….
Anyway, I responded to an article on the "transgender hierarchy," in which pointed out, as an aside, that I do not accept the label "transgender" and they went ballistic. And, as I wrote about in my last article, they resorted to censorship, but then backed off…somewhat surprisingly, but they also went on the offensive, finally tracking down the crap that the cyberstalker who calls himself "Diane" Lask has been pushing for years. And of course, they were just thrilled. They thought that I would curl up a die, or something.
Hey, like I said, it is all lies, and pretty obviously so.
In any case, "Mark" who isn't the brightest bulb in the bunch, FINALLY, after twice having posts blocked here for violating the One Rule, figured out that, "DUH!" he could do the same thing, Now, he has resorted to moderating posts, so he can prevent me from embarrassing them.
In the end, it got downright hilarious. One of this gang of idiots, a very masculine transgender from Canada, who fancies himself a "writer" (he vanity published a book) even went so far as to post threats of violence…why do they always want to resort to stalking? This is copied, verbatim…and is by the "writer" Mr. "Jacqueline" Waters. I leave it to my readers to decide for yourself if this sounds like a woman? Or like some insane drag queen?
And honey, no man here and I will out bitch slap the fuck out of you any day. You see, I don;t mind flying anywhere at anytime to deal face to face with any cunt..I will even show you my pussy while I am there so you can come back and apologize for how stupid you really are.
So if you would like to set up a meeting so we can discuss matters in person, just let me know. Other than that shut your pie hole (no doubt the only hole you have besides the one in your head where a brain is supposed to be located).
Unlike you, I have a life and work to do that goes far above playing silly little games with a bitch boy keyboard commando troll.
So when and where? Just let me know. If you live in a nice place I will come back and let everyone know they were wrong about you being poor and near homeless. I mean all this shit is easily resolved. You show me yours and I will show you mine ok?Aside from posting this after there is no way I can respond (which is probably why he posted it, since he is confident I wouldn't be able to take him up on it) this is almost hilarious. Now, I have no desire to invite some violent man to come visit me in San Francisco. I am certainly not going to allow some nut case associated with this band of lunatics to gather private information, like where I live, and such. And I sure am not going to expose myself to some pervert.
But this, I fear, is a classic example of transgender mentality. My feelings on the subject can be summed up in a post I made in response to an article defending "transgender ideology" there. I responded directly to a could of statements in the article. Here is the cold, hard truth that finally pushed Ms. "Mark" over the edge…
"You expect to be properly identified and treated as any other woman (If you are Female-to-Male then the same logic will apply for you as a man.)"
And your answer to this is to publicly identify as something that clearly marks you as NOT be a woman (or a man, for the FTMs) at all. In spite of your silly claims (based on male-sexist concepts that only "drop-dead gorgeous" women…which is ironic at best for this bunch, matter) I live as a woman, not as a "trans woman." You can tell me what you think, but I know what I live.
"And for those transsexual extremists out there.... if you hate transgender so much, why spend all your time attacking the people who do feel comfortable with the term?"
When you stop trying to use us as your beards, when you stop demanding that society accept idiocy like "women have penises," and "men can become pregnant," when you stop advocating that just because some dude claims he feels like a woman, he has to be accepted as one, when you stop defending perverts like Colleen Francis, when you stop demanding the right of pre-op (who, if legitimate, would NEVER do such a thing) and so-called "non-op transsexuals" (an oxymoron) to be in women's spaces where nudity is likely, when you stop trying to get the right to change your birth certificate without actually changing your self (again, women do not have penises, and men cannot get pregnant) and especially when you state, without qualification or reservation, that ONLY people who self-identify as transgender should ever be referred to as transgender, then and ONLY THEN, will we stop attacking you. Until then, well you deserve to be made to fill like the extremists you are. And no, we won't "shut the hell up!" We will speak out, and oppose your extremism. And we will help bring about the coming backlash, and hopefully prevent if from consuming us along with you.Time will tell what happens. Ms. Cummings made a couple of threats that could come back to haunt him if he follows through, but as they say, "Spoilers, darling, spoilers…" I will check that blog from time to time, as I do other transgender blogs, but since they have gone full blown censorship, I won't be posting there. I think I have pretty much said all that is worth saying to them there anyway.
Monday, November 18, 2013
Apparently, Lask is Feeling Some Heat
I just noticed that Mr. "Diane" Lask is trying, rather vainly, to cover his tracks by claiming to be posting from England...
Nice try, but I'm not buying it. If he thinks I will simply accept his claims, well he is a fool. He can pop in anytime, and check out where people have posted from, and claim to be any one of them. Hardly clever at all.... And, of course, it is not that hard to fake an IP address and appear to be posting from somewhere else as well. I have a suspicion that Lask may have pulled a stunt like that.... In any case, there are serious holes in his story, if you just bother to look.
I have been harassed by Lask for years, and his style is pretty obvious. Yes, I know that more than a few men in dresses don't care for me, but as I say, Lask sticks out like a sore thumb.... The holes in the story, and the writing style? Yeah, it's Lask!
Too funny!
Nice try, but I'm not buying it. If he thinks I will simply accept his claims, well he is a fool. He can pop in anytime, and check out where people have posted from, and claim to be any one of them. Hardly clever at all.... And, of course, it is not that hard to fake an IP address and appear to be posting from somewhere else as well. I have a suspicion that Lask may have pulled a stunt like that.... In any case, there are serious holes in his story, if you just bother to look.
I have been harassed by Lask for years, and his style is pretty obvious. Yes, I know that more than a few men in dresses don't care for me, but as I say, Lask sticks out like a sore thumb.... The holes in the story, and the writing style? Yeah, it's Lask!
Too funny!
The Return of the Idiot Troll...
In my last posting, I talked about my error of thinking Elizabeth at Notes From the T-Side might have gotten over her little snit about the Colorado high school case. Among other aspects of all that, I wondered how long it would be before the nasty stalker, "Diane" Lask would pop back up. Well, it didn't take that long….
As he tends to do, this person, who I used to refer to as an "idiot troll" back in the waning days of my regular involvement on Usenet, made another round of nasty, and quite false, claims.
The funny part in all of this, is how this whole episode seems to sum up a lot that is wrong with how both transsexuals and those who make up the quite separate "transgender community" tend to act out online.
As I have pointed out, there is often a tendency of some to elevate themselves to a sort of self-aggrandized status as a "pioneer" of sorts. Suzan Cooke has made an online career of this sort of silliness, and Elizabeth has adopted the same sort of approach. The story is always the same. They were an early transitioner. They had no doubts, no insecurities, their transition was flawless, and anyone who does not agree with their every infallible pronouncement is, at best, suspect.
And they tend to surround themselves with a bunch of sycophants who provide a chorus of ego strokes that allows them to hide some very obvious insecurities. I will give Elizabeth credit for one thing…she tends to not be as inclined to censorship as Cooke, who apparently can't deal with disagreement at all. And, so far, Elizabeth has resisted the urge to completely abandon all principles and pledge her troth to Mr. "Cristan" Williams and the transgender extremists.
The truly funny part is, for a group, including Elizabeth herself, who seem to be inclined to question others intelligence, they seem to have seriously impaired reading comprehension. My final words there, albeit a bit garbled when my fingers slipped and I missed what the spell checker produced, were "I should have gone with my first instinct and ignored you. I won't make that mistake again."
That after ignoring quite a bit of drivel that preceded the post I responded to. But, both Elizabeth, and several in her sycophant chorus, chimed in like fools, to suggest I should go elsewhere. Hmmm, now perhaps they are simply posturing like childish fools, trying to boost their own egos, by telling themselves that they "bested" me. When, as I said, I don't post there again, they can tell themselves that it was their doing.
But, back to Lask, and his latest round of garbage. This is the classic example of what people like Elizabeth surround themselves with. Lask postures about how he is a "A true TS misidentified by JJ." Actually, Lask, as I have pointed out, turns out to have never had SRS. For quite some time, Lask hid behind a claim of his surgery having "failed." Of course when one considers that Lask also used to brag about his great successes as a well paid programmer (including claiming to have owned a Corvette) one also has to wonder why Lask never had corrective surgery. Now, Lask simply hides behind fake names, and anonymous remailers to lash out at imagined enemies.
Lask likes to make a big deal out of some poorly chosen words I put on a website I threw together back when having a vanity web site was "the thing." (Now, that would be having a blog instead.) The funny part is, Lask not only strongly identified as a transvestite at one time, he was a very active member of a group originally known as Educational TV Channel, which morphed into Transgender San Francisco, or more commonly, TGSF. Yes, Mr, "true transsexual" was an active member of a transvestite social group. And he wants to accuse others of being autogynephilic. Even funnier, Lask likes to parrot Michael Bailey, and point out that I am a "techie." Well, Lask spent years as a programmer and as a very active transvestite. Hmmm….
Lask, along with a few others, is the reason there are parts of my past I simply don't disclose. Yes, that leads to, as some claim, my backstory lacking "consistency." And if someone wants to attempt to exploit that, that is certainly their privilege. Lask's backstory lacks quite a bit of veracity, but Lask sticks to simple lies, leaving out major details such as his military career (he certainly was NOT an early transitioner) and his involvement with a transvestite social club. But hey, some people are just very skilled liars. That is typical of what psychologists would label a "sociopath."
As he tends to do, this person, who I used to refer to as an "idiot troll" back in the waning days of my regular involvement on Usenet, made another round of nasty, and quite false, claims.
The funny part in all of this, is how this whole episode seems to sum up a lot that is wrong with how both transsexuals and those who make up the quite separate "transgender community" tend to act out online.
As I have pointed out, there is often a tendency of some to elevate themselves to a sort of self-aggrandized status as a "pioneer" of sorts. Suzan Cooke has made an online career of this sort of silliness, and Elizabeth has adopted the same sort of approach. The story is always the same. They were an early transitioner. They had no doubts, no insecurities, their transition was flawless, and anyone who does not agree with their every infallible pronouncement is, at best, suspect.
And they tend to surround themselves with a bunch of sycophants who provide a chorus of ego strokes that allows them to hide some very obvious insecurities. I will give Elizabeth credit for one thing…she tends to not be as inclined to censorship as Cooke, who apparently can't deal with disagreement at all. And, so far, Elizabeth has resisted the urge to completely abandon all principles and pledge her troth to Mr. "Cristan" Williams and the transgender extremists.
The truly funny part is, for a group, including Elizabeth herself, who seem to be inclined to question others intelligence, they seem to have seriously impaired reading comprehension. My final words there, albeit a bit garbled when my fingers slipped and I missed what the spell checker produced, were "I should have gone with my first instinct and ignored you. I won't make that mistake again."
That after ignoring quite a bit of drivel that preceded the post I responded to. But, both Elizabeth, and several in her sycophant chorus, chimed in like fools, to suggest I should go elsewhere. Hmmm, now perhaps they are simply posturing like childish fools, trying to boost their own egos, by telling themselves that they "bested" me. When, as I said, I don't post there again, they can tell themselves that it was their doing.
But, back to Lask, and his latest round of garbage. This is the classic example of what people like Elizabeth surround themselves with. Lask postures about how he is a "A true TS misidentified by JJ." Actually, Lask, as I have pointed out, turns out to have never had SRS. For quite some time, Lask hid behind a claim of his surgery having "failed." Of course when one considers that Lask also used to brag about his great successes as a well paid programmer (including claiming to have owned a Corvette) one also has to wonder why Lask never had corrective surgery. Now, Lask simply hides behind fake names, and anonymous remailers to lash out at imagined enemies.
Lask likes to make a big deal out of some poorly chosen words I put on a website I threw together back when having a vanity web site was "the thing." (Now, that would be having a blog instead.) The funny part is, Lask not only strongly identified as a transvestite at one time, he was a very active member of a group originally known as Educational TV Channel, which morphed into Transgender San Francisco, or more commonly, TGSF. Yes, Mr, "true transsexual" was an active member of a transvestite social group. And he wants to accuse others of being autogynephilic. Even funnier, Lask likes to parrot Michael Bailey, and point out that I am a "techie." Well, Lask spent years as a programmer and as a very active transvestite. Hmmm….
Lask, along with a few others, is the reason there are parts of my past I simply don't disclose. Yes, that leads to, as some claim, my backstory lacking "consistency." And if someone wants to attempt to exploit that, that is certainly their privilege. Lask's backstory lacks quite a bit of veracity, but Lask sticks to simple lies, leaving out major details such as his military career (he certainly was NOT an early transitioner) and his involvement with a transvestite social club. But hey, some people are just very skilled liars. That is typical of what psychologists would label a "sociopath."
Thursday, September 12, 2013
From Cyberstalker to Just a Stalker
Well, it appears that Mr. "Autumn" Sandeen decided to up his game from simply cyberstalking to actual threats. In a round of tweets, he asked what I would say during a face to face meeting. I made it clear that this is not desired, and that if it happened, I would be calling the police and report him. He then began pushing for such a meeting. This crossed the line.
I have blocked Mr. Sandeen, who has a record of cyberstalking me, and have reported him to Twitter for harassment. I had no problem with online sparring, but I have NO desire for physical contact with him, whether another is present or not.
Of course, in typical fashion, Mr. "Cristan" Williams and Mr. Sandeen are trying to spin this and "blame the victim." The bottom line remains...Mr. Sandeen tried to push for contact, I decline, he persisted. That feels very threatening, especially in light of various threats made against women by a number of "transgender extremists." Again, a man refuses to take "No!" for an answer.
I will continue to document his lies and distortions. I will not allow him to bully me into silence.
I have blocked Mr. Sandeen, who has a record of cyberstalking me, and have reported him to Twitter for harassment. I had no problem with online sparring, but I have NO desire for physical contact with him, whether another is present or not.
Of course, in typical fashion, Mr. "Cristan" Williams and Mr. Sandeen are trying to spin this and "blame the victim." The bottom line remains...Mr. Sandeen tried to push for contact, I decline, he persisted. That feels very threatening, especially in light of various threats made against women by a number of "transgender extremists." Again, a man refuses to take "No!" for an answer.
I will continue to document his lies and distortions. I will not allow him to bully me into silence.
Wednesday, August 21, 2013
Fifteen Years of Cyberstalking
Note: This is probably going to be an evolving article. The purpose is to document the behavior of someone who is engaged in harassment against me. I have added to it several times already. If you are interested, check back regularly. If not, well, just ignore it.
About fifteen years ago, I was recovering from my first failed attempt at transition. I am not going to go into a lot of detail, but I made several mistakes, mainly rushing into transition, and I had a very poor excuse for a therapist who failed to pick up on a number of issues I was struggling with. When, as some call them, external pressures got to be too much, I fled back to, as I have put it, "the devil I knew."
It took me seven years to work through it all. During that time, I discovered a newsgroup with the ironic name alt.support.srs. I say ironic because it was anything but supportive. The group was largely terrorized by a group of bullies that included a person who used the name Cheryl, and another who posted as Diane. They were commonly referred to as "The Sisters of Transsexual Purity" because they would attack anyone who was not, in their judgement, 100% committed to SRS, and progressing at a pace that met their rather stringent standards.
The really ironic part was, neither was post-op, as they claimed. The truth about Cheryl came out after that person was found dead in front of their computer. Someone from the sheriff's department used instant messaging in an attempt to get information, and the person contacted let the newsgroup know that this person had died.
Diane, aka Diane Arons, whose real name is Diane Arons Lask had a rather long history of bullying and cyberstalking that began on FidoNet, if not earlier. For those too young to remember, FidoNet is a network of computer bulletin board systems that was sort of a predecessor of the Internet. It is not very popular in the United States these days, but is still in existence, and is more commonly used in Russia and former republics of the USSR. FidoNet was primarily through the phone system. A BBS would call an uplink hub and exchange outgoing messages for incoming ones. It might take a few days for a posting in forum to reach everyone. It was one of several such "echo net" programs available.
One of the features of FidoNet is forums, which were sort of like mailing lists or Usenet groups. And one of the forums on FidoNet was for the discussion of gender issues and Lask was very much a presence there. And was certainly one of the reasons FidoNet was jokingly called Fight-o-Net.
I didn't access the gender forum on FidoNet because I had not transitioned, and did not want friends to know my medical situation. If you were on a BBS, it was very easy for the sysop to tell what forums you participated in.
FidoNet was where Lask first encountered a person who called himself Laura Masters (later Laura Blake). Blake was a transgender extremist from Canada who developed quite a reputation for opposing SRS, and claiming to have "jumped the gurney" on the way to having it. How much of this was true was never really certain, but Lask developed an major obsession with Blake that would be a driving force in his life for many years.
Now, there is no question that Blake contributed to the whole mess. Shoot, I will admit to taking more than a few potshots at Blake, who spent a great deal of time attacking transsexuals and trying to pressure people into being "woman-males" to use his term. Of course, now, the drivel pushed by Blake has become a large part of the transgender dogma, and ironically, Lask seems to have adopted this view as well.
Actually, to be honest, it is never really clear exactly what Lask believes. Over the years, Lask has attacked, and then sided with, a number of people. For example, he viciously attacked "Willow" Arune, a notorious online kook, and then took to defending him. The same was true of a several others.
The weird thing with Lask is I actually have met this person. Several years ago, after he stopped harassing me, he contacted me and explained that he had been homeless for some time. He had been staying in Nevada, and wanted to return to San Francisco and wanted to know if he could sleep on my floor for a period. Now, I tend to be a forgiving, and compassionate person, and I agreed. Lask stayed for several days, before moving in with a post-op who, ironically, had responded to a person ad I had placed, even though I an a straight woman. This person was apparently some sort of trans fan, who preferred transsexuals as partners. I was not interested, but did seek to interest that person in the research project where I was volunteering at the time.
When I met Lask, one of the more bizarre facts I learned was that this supposed paragon of transsexualism actually had a history with a group originally known as Educational TV Channel (EDTVC) in San Francisco. It is now known as TransGender SF or TGSF.
Lask turned on me when he decided, rather suddenly, that the alt.support.srs group should be abandoned to the kooks like Arune. I declined to agree to that idea, and Lask disappeared for a while. Then there were suddenly someone appeared posting through an anonymous remailer and attacking me. Those postings seemed to be Lask's styles, but at first I was not completely sure it was him. Finally, he made reference to some things that only Lask could have known, and it was obvious that Lask had adopted me as a replacement for Blake.
Lask became increasingly abusive, and it was about this time that he suddenly began to defend Arune, and at least one other person he had rather viciously attacked. I became the sole object of his attention, though he did occasionally check up on Blake (who had withdrawn from the Internet entirely to escape Lask) and provided "updates."
BTW, at one time, Blake was posting claims about Lask's harassment that many took at either fiction, or delusional. Now, I wonder, as i have been the victim of similar attacks.
A few years ago, Lask mounted a massive cyberbullying attack on me. He sent anonymous emails to several transgender activists urging them to contact my employer in an effort to cause me grief. He basically bragged about this on alt.support.srs.
One of Lask's main tactics is to do extensive online research on a target. He will scour Google looking for anything he can exploit. I have learned to be very circumspect about what I allow to be posted online, and, thankfully, Lask does not know a lot about my current life. Of course, it can be a constant battle. Changes in Facebook security allowed him to find my daughter, for example. He then found a blog post she had written about ten years ago, at a time when we were estranged. As I have said elsewhere, I will not do what Lask did, and invade my daughter's privacy by revealing details, but suffice to say, we are no longer estranged and are very close. She was very upset at being used as a weapon against me, and was furious that Mr. "Autumn" Sandeen tried to contact her.
After finding a mention about me on my church's website, he made a similar effort to attack me through my church, mistakenly thinking I was then employed there. I found out about this when Suzan Cooke wrote about having received one, and to Cooke's credit, declined to participate. On the other hand, Mr. "Autumn" Sandeen was chose to take up Lask's suggestion and I wrote about it here.
Lask has always had a tendency to come and go. Even when he is active, there is an odd pattern of several days of almost continuous attacks, almost around the clock, followed by a period when he falls silent. Well, he had disappeared for some time...until recently.
The first sign that Lask was back was, as is often the case, not completely obvious. A person started posting in the comments section of Mr. Sandeen's column on LGBT Weekly under the name "Jenna." At first this person seemed to be a "radical feminist," and even seemed to be disagreeing with Mr. Sandeen. Then, after I made a comment in support of something he said, he attacked me. The person's statements were very inconsistent. Then, over time, it became obvious that this was not only a troll, but was Lask.
The person calling himself "Jenna" repeatedly denied being Lask, but then suddenly, every message where I mentioned "Diane Lask" was deleted. Yeah, sure it wasn't Lask. Uh huh, yeah.... Oh, and he is back at it again, trying to imply that he is another troll from Usenet. No one ever said Lask was very bright...
Since that time, Lask has used the name "Jenna Smith" to access my LinkedIn profile, and has impersonated me on several web sites, as well as using the names of my ex, and my daughter. He has also apparently created a twitter account using my photo.
This person is a a seriously mentally ill person, and to be honest, there obsession makes me feel rather threatened. While he has been careful to never say anything that could be taken as a physical threat, a person who is this obsessed can easily turn violent. So, I am taking this opportunity, knowing that he reads this blog to say to the person using the name Diane Arons Lask, that I am demanding that he cease his harassment.
I realize this is an unusual post, but the primary purpose is to go on the record concerning this person, to comply with a provision of California state law requiring that I inform the person to cease harassing me, and to insure that anyone doing a Google search for Diane Lask will see this information.
About fifteen years ago, I was recovering from my first failed attempt at transition. I am not going to go into a lot of detail, but I made several mistakes, mainly rushing into transition, and I had a very poor excuse for a therapist who failed to pick up on a number of issues I was struggling with. When, as some call them, external pressures got to be too much, I fled back to, as I have put it, "the devil I knew."
It took me seven years to work through it all. During that time, I discovered a newsgroup with the ironic name alt.support.srs. I say ironic because it was anything but supportive. The group was largely terrorized by a group of bullies that included a person who used the name Cheryl, and another who posted as Diane. They were commonly referred to as "The Sisters of Transsexual Purity" because they would attack anyone who was not, in their judgement, 100% committed to SRS, and progressing at a pace that met their rather stringent standards.
The really ironic part was, neither was post-op, as they claimed. The truth about Cheryl came out after that person was found dead in front of their computer. Someone from the sheriff's department used instant messaging in an attempt to get information, and the person contacted let the newsgroup know that this person had died.
Diane, aka Diane Arons, whose real name is Diane Arons Lask had a rather long history of bullying and cyberstalking that began on FidoNet, if not earlier. For those too young to remember, FidoNet is a network of computer bulletin board systems that was sort of a predecessor of the Internet. It is not very popular in the United States these days, but is still in existence, and is more commonly used in Russia and former republics of the USSR. FidoNet was primarily through the phone system. A BBS would call an uplink hub and exchange outgoing messages for incoming ones. It might take a few days for a posting in forum to reach everyone. It was one of several such "echo net" programs available.
One of the features of FidoNet is forums, which were sort of like mailing lists or Usenet groups. And one of the forums on FidoNet was for the discussion of gender issues and Lask was very much a presence there. And was certainly one of the reasons FidoNet was jokingly called Fight-o-Net.
I didn't access the gender forum on FidoNet because I had not transitioned, and did not want friends to know my medical situation. If you were on a BBS, it was very easy for the sysop to tell what forums you participated in.
FidoNet was where Lask first encountered a person who called himself Laura Masters (later Laura Blake). Blake was a transgender extremist from Canada who developed quite a reputation for opposing SRS, and claiming to have "jumped the gurney" on the way to having it. How much of this was true was never really certain, but Lask developed an major obsession with Blake that would be a driving force in his life for many years.
Now, there is no question that Blake contributed to the whole mess. Shoot, I will admit to taking more than a few potshots at Blake, who spent a great deal of time attacking transsexuals and trying to pressure people into being "woman-males" to use his term. Of course, now, the drivel pushed by Blake has become a large part of the transgender dogma, and ironically, Lask seems to have adopted this view as well.
Actually, to be honest, it is never really clear exactly what Lask believes. Over the years, Lask has attacked, and then sided with, a number of people. For example, he viciously attacked "Willow" Arune, a notorious online kook, and then took to defending him. The same was true of a several others.
The weird thing with Lask is I actually have met this person. Several years ago, after he stopped harassing me, he contacted me and explained that he had been homeless for some time. He had been staying in Nevada, and wanted to return to San Francisco and wanted to know if he could sleep on my floor for a period. Now, I tend to be a forgiving, and compassionate person, and I agreed. Lask stayed for several days, before moving in with a post-op who, ironically, had responded to a person ad I had placed, even though I an a straight woman. This person was apparently some sort of trans fan, who preferred transsexuals as partners. I was not interested, but did seek to interest that person in the research project where I was volunteering at the time.
When I met Lask, one of the more bizarre facts I learned was that this supposed paragon of transsexualism actually had a history with a group originally known as Educational TV Channel (EDTVC) in San Francisco. It is now known as TransGender SF or TGSF.
Lask turned on me when he decided, rather suddenly, that the alt.support.srs group should be abandoned to the kooks like Arune. I declined to agree to that idea, and Lask disappeared for a while. Then there were suddenly someone appeared posting through an anonymous remailer and attacking me. Those postings seemed to be Lask's styles, but at first I was not completely sure it was him. Finally, he made reference to some things that only Lask could have known, and it was obvious that Lask had adopted me as a replacement for Blake.
Lask became increasingly abusive, and it was about this time that he suddenly began to defend Arune, and at least one other person he had rather viciously attacked. I became the sole object of his attention, though he did occasionally check up on Blake (who had withdrawn from the Internet entirely to escape Lask) and provided "updates."
BTW, at one time, Blake was posting claims about Lask's harassment that many took at either fiction, or delusional. Now, I wonder, as i have been the victim of similar attacks.
A few years ago, Lask mounted a massive cyberbullying attack on me. He sent anonymous emails to several transgender activists urging them to contact my employer in an effort to cause me grief. He basically bragged about this on alt.support.srs.
One of Lask's main tactics is to do extensive online research on a target. He will scour Google looking for anything he can exploit. I have learned to be very circumspect about what I allow to be posted online, and, thankfully, Lask does not know a lot about my current life. Of course, it can be a constant battle. Changes in Facebook security allowed him to find my daughter, for example. He then found a blog post she had written about ten years ago, at a time when we were estranged. As I have said elsewhere, I will not do what Lask did, and invade my daughter's privacy by revealing details, but suffice to say, we are no longer estranged and are very close. She was very upset at being used as a weapon against me, and was furious that Mr. "Autumn" Sandeen tried to contact her.
After finding a mention about me on my church's website, he made a similar effort to attack me through my church, mistakenly thinking I was then employed there. I found out about this when Suzan Cooke wrote about having received one, and to Cooke's credit, declined to participate. On the other hand, Mr. "Autumn" Sandeen was chose to take up Lask's suggestion and I wrote about it here.
Lask has always had a tendency to come and go. Even when he is active, there is an odd pattern of several days of almost continuous attacks, almost around the clock, followed by a period when he falls silent. Well, he had disappeared for some time...until recently.
The first sign that Lask was back was, as is often the case, not completely obvious. A person started posting in the comments section of Mr. Sandeen's column on LGBT Weekly under the name "Jenna." At first this person seemed to be a "radical feminist," and even seemed to be disagreeing with Mr. Sandeen. Then, after I made a comment in support of something he said, he attacked me. The person's statements were very inconsistent. Then, over time, it became obvious that this was not only a troll, but was Lask.
The person calling himself "Jenna" repeatedly denied being Lask, but then suddenly, every message where I mentioned "Diane Lask" was deleted. Yeah, sure it wasn't Lask. Uh huh, yeah.... Oh, and he is back at it again, trying to imply that he is another troll from Usenet. No one ever said Lask was very bright...
Since that time, Lask has used the name "Jenna Smith" to access my LinkedIn profile, and has impersonated me on several web sites, as well as using the names of my ex, and my daughter. He has also apparently created a twitter account using my photo.
This person is a a seriously mentally ill person, and to be honest, there obsession makes me feel rather threatened. While he has been careful to never say anything that could be taken as a physical threat, a person who is this obsessed can easily turn violent. So, I am taking this opportunity, knowing that he reads this blog to say to the person using the name Diane Arons Lask, that I am demanding that he cease his harassment.
I realize this is an unusual post, but the primary purpose is to go on the record concerning this person, to comply with a provision of California state law requiring that I inform the person to cease harassing me, and to insure that anyone doing a Google search for Diane Lask will see this information.
Monday, July 22, 2013
Wow, The Boys Want to Play Rough!
Let's see... I just had to censor (something I really hate doing) a comment from Mr. "Cristan" Williams, because he violated the one rule I have here, which is you don't invade privacy. First off, he mention something about a regular commenter here, and that alone was grounds for his post being blocked.
But then I noticed he has joined the recent effort to get really nasty with cyberstalking me. He quoted something that I was not familiar with, that allegedly came from my daughter. Well, of course I placed a phone call to her. She had me send her the quote, which she was rather surprised by.
Now, she did something rather smart. She Googled it, and it turns out that it comes from a comment on Mr. "Dana" Lane Taylor's Blog, which also appears to be the "source" of the other comment mentioned above. That comment appears to be a total fabrication.
Once I saw the full quote on Mr. Taylor's blog, from someone claiming to be "Rebecca" it made a bit more sense. My daughter is not sure exactly where it came from, but whatever the source, it is clear that it was posted at a time, about nine years ago, when we were not on the best of terms. That is long past history, and it appears that someone has been very naughty, and has gone to great lengths to find anything they can use. This is not something that would be easily found...
I am not going to provide details as to the conflict between us, except to say that it has been settled, that the cause had nothing to do with my being a transsexual, that the stuff was written by someone who was in a very bad place at the time, and that I have a very wonderful relationship with my daughter and my grandchildren.
In another words, potentially illegal activities are afoot, so to speak. Not surprising, as I have clearly upset some very violent men, including both Mr. Taylor, and Mr. Williams. Mr. Williams has been accused, though he is full of denials, of threatening a journalist, mainly because said person does not believe men should be able to put on women's clothing and force their way into women's spaces. Mr. Williams does not handle disagreement, or rejection very well. If he doesn't get his way, well, let's just say he can be very nasty.
I am about 99% certain who the cyberstalker is. Mr. Williams, like Mr. Sandeen before him, is simply allowing this sleaze-ball to use him. The person in question is a very disturbed man, who used to be a terror on Usenet. There, ironically, he harassed a person who posted as "Laura Masters" and later as "Laura Blake" for years. It's ironic, because Blake was one of the first true transgender kooks. His spiel was that no one should have surgery, and we should all accept that were were "woman/male." Sort of an early version of the woman with a penis crap preached now. That feud is approaching 20 years I believe, and began on Fidonet.
The style is classic, and his tactic is to take a bit of true information when he can find it, and then basically extrapolate wildly. The said thing is, I actually tried, at one time, to help this person out. So, you might ask, what did I do that turned him into my mortal enemy? I declined to go along with a request that we effectively shut down the old group on Usenet by pulling out. He then started posting anonymously, but some of his comments gave away who he really was. Now that Usenet is effectively dead, he moved on to stalking people on blogs and such.
Oh well, if the nasty boys think they can scare me off, like they did at least one blogger, they can think again. Their lies don't bother me. Obviously I worry them.... That's nice. It means they know I am telling the truth, which is the one thing they can't abide.
Oh, and one other bit of irony... I you go back and you read the post that started Mr. Dana Lane Taylor on his hateful path, I was actually trying to be nice. I honestly felt that he was hurting, and I tried to cut him some slack. But, hey, even if you do it nicely, the transgender kooks just can't handle disagreement any better than they can handle rejection. Mr. Taylor went off the deep end because he found out he can't demand that lesbians have sex with him... I mean, after all, just because he has a penis is no reason for a woman, who prefers women, to reject him.
Oh, and no, I am not mad "because [he] got the first 'Mr.' in..." And no, we never had the same mindset. He was delusional, and clearly was never a transsexual.
And things are getting more interesting... My daughter called me back after getting the grandkids to bed, and we spent some time figuring out how someone found that old site. They had to have searched through Facebook to find her. I have my Facebook privacy setting on the highest level, just for the purpose of preventing people from bothering me and my friends. They had to have looked for anyone who might be related to me.
On top of that, Mr. "Autumn" Sandeen posted a comment, an unwelcome comment, on her old journal page. As she put it, "What he did is just....creepy." Then, in what has to be one of the most idiotic moves that fool has ever made, he sent me a friend request on Facebook.
But then I noticed he has joined the recent effort to get really nasty with cyberstalking me. He quoted something that I was not familiar with, that allegedly came from my daughter. Well, of course I placed a phone call to her. She had me send her the quote, which she was rather surprised by.
Now, she did something rather smart. She Googled it, and it turns out that it comes from a comment on Mr. "Dana" Lane Taylor's Blog, which also appears to be the "source" of the other comment mentioned above. That comment appears to be a total fabrication.
Once I saw the full quote on Mr. Taylor's blog, from someone claiming to be "Rebecca" it made a bit more sense. My daughter is not sure exactly where it came from, but whatever the source, it is clear that it was posted at a time, about nine years ago, when we were not on the best of terms. That is long past history, and it appears that someone has been very naughty, and has gone to great lengths to find anything they can use. This is not something that would be easily found...
I am not going to provide details as to the conflict between us, except to say that it has been settled, that the cause had nothing to do with my being a transsexual, that the stuff was written by someone who was in a very bad place at the time, and that I have a very wonderful relationship with my daughter and my grandchildren.
In another words, potentially illegal activities are afoot, so to speak. Not surprising, as I have clearly upset some very violent men, including both Mr. Taylor, and Mr. Williams. Mr. Williams has been accused, though he is full of denials, of threatening a journalist, mainly because said person does not believe men should be able to put on women's clothing and force their way into women's spaces. Mr. Williams does not handle disagreement, or rejection very well. If he doesn't get his way, well, let's just say he can be very nasty.
I am about 99% certain who the cyberstalker is. Mr. Williams, like Mr. Sandeen before him, is simply allowing this sleaze-ball to use him. The person in question is a very disturbed man, who used to be a terror on Usenet. There, ironically, he harassed a person who posted as "Laura Masters" and later as "Laura Blake" for years. It's ironic, because Blake was one of the first true transgender kooks. His spiel was that no one should have surgery, and we should all accept that were were "woman/male." Sort of an early version of the woman with a penis crap preached now. That feud is approaching 20 years I believe, and began on Fidonet.
The style is classic, and his tactic is to take a bit of true information when he can find it, and then basically extrapolate wildly. The said thing is, I actually tried, at one time, to help this person out. So, you might ask, what did I do that turned him into my mortal enemy? I declined to go along with a request that we effectively shut down the old group on Usenet by pulling out. He then started posting anonymously, but some of his comments gave away who he really was. Now that Usenet is effectively dead, he moved on to stalking people on blogs and such.
Oh well, if the nasty boys think they can scare me off, like they did at least one blogger, they can think again. Their lies don't bother me. Obviously I worry them.... That's nice. It means they know I am telling the truth, which is the one thing they can't abide.
Oh, and one other bit of irony... I you go back and you read the post that started Mr. Dana Lane Taylor on his hateful path, I was actually trying to be nice. I honestly felt that he was hurting, and I tried to cut him some slack. But, hey, even if you do it nicely, the transgender kooks just can't handle disagreement any better than they can handle rejection. Mr. Taylor went off the deep end because he found out he can't demand that lesbians have sex with him... I mean, after all, just because he has a penis is no reason for a woman, who prefers women, to reject him.
Oh, and no, I am not mad "because [he] got the first 'Mr.' in..." And no, we never had the same mindset. He was delusional, and clearly was never a transsexual.
And things are getting more interesting... My daughter called me back after getting the grandkids to bed, and we spent some time figuring out how someone found that old site. They had to have searched through Facebook to find her. I have my Facebook privacy setting on the highest level, just for the purpose of preventing people from bothering me and my friends. They had to have looked for anyone who might be related to me.
On top of that, Mr. "Autumn" Sandeen posted a comment, an unwelcome comment, on her old journal page. As she put it, "What he did is just....creepy." Then, in what has to be one of the most idiotic moves that fool has ever made, he sent me a friend request on Facebook.
Friday, April 26, 2013
Mr. Sandeen Has A Complete Meltdown
Well, I can't say I am totally surprised, but Mr. "Autumn" Sandeen has finally had a complete breakdown online. In the past, his kook has cyberstalked me, in an attempt to censor what I say about transgender extremists. This morning, he went off the deep end and posted a rather interesting article on Transadvocate.
Now, Sandeen starts off by claiming to have been cyberbullied, and cyberstalked three times and offers links (note, links as in plural) to document this. Oddly enough, they are all the same link. I don't know if he had simply become so angry he was not thinking, or if he thinks his readers are that ignorant. He then says something that shows just how insane he really is...
Hmmm, let's look at that definition of cyberstalking he posted.
Let's compare here... I write a blog about issues affecting transsexuals, which includes the silliness pushed by transgender extremists like Sandeen, among others. Sandeen is very active in pushing an agenda that I rather vehemently oppose. I express my opinion on these issues. Further, my blog welcomes anyone who wants to comment, and has only one rule...respect privacy. The only people I have ever blocked have been those who attempt to engage in the sort of harassment that Sandeen is guilty of. Granted, the one time that Sandeen attempted to comment here, his post went to spam, which I was not even aware had been added in an update, and I did not see it until long past the day it was sent. Sandeen tends to prefer posting drivel of the sort we see here, from blogs that are heavily censored.
Now, Sandeen goes on to try to defend another of his attempts to intimidate me. He threatened to use some photos that were obtained by "Willow" Arune through deceit and provided to a vicious cyberstalker, the one who prompted Sandeen to contact my church. This person also contacted Suzan Cooke. To Cooke's credit, she declined to engage in such behavior, having more ethics than Sandeen. Ironically, Cooke does not brag about how she is so like Martin Luther King, Jr.
Now, for example, I have no idea how Sandeen got the photo he used in his post. It is one taken of me some years ago, by a guy I dated a couple of time, and was used by me in various places. It is not one of the one's Arune stole (hey, unlike some people I prefer truth).
Now, as to Sandeen's "meat puppeting" (funny, given I never mentioned that term...) that is kind of obvious. His columns rarely rate more than a few comments. Rather suddenly, there seemed to be a chorus of very similar remarks, including a number from a supposed radical feminist who attacked me and another transsexual, including as Sandeen puts it, misgendering us (funny, Sandeen never said a word) but this person defended Sandeen who has also cyberstalked a number of lesbian women. Perhaps I am mistaken, but I will go with Occam's Razor on this one...
A few final thoughts...
I am supposedly obsessed with Sandeen, but which of us put what was obviously quite a bit of time and effort into searching the Internet for detailed information on someone? What I write about Sandeen is based on reading his posts on LGBT Weekly, and Pam's House Blend. And more recently, Twitter. Hmm, folks be warned...reading Sandeen's public writings is stalking him in his twisted mind. I actually started my blog, largely in reaction to his, and other transgender extremists efforts to hide dissent.
I would welcome anyone to my church, and in fact, we have had transgender people visit. Funny thing...I generally don't take political issues to church with me. And that is, really, what this eventually is. A political disagreement. Sandeen wants to rend asunder the fabric of society. I oppose his efforts to subvert gender. He just takes it a bit too personally. And that is just his reaction to my speaking out against his ridiculous demands for society. As to what else I might do, that is none of his business as it does not directly involve him. Suffice to say, I won't be donning a uniform I am not entitled to wear (he mocked women, and the US Navy) and chaining myself to the White House fence. Or otherwise making a public fool of myself. Unlike him, I do not seek, or appreciate attention.
I will no more pander to Sandeen's delusions than I would those of the gentleman who I had the misfortune to have sit next to me on the bus the other day. He started ranting, to anyone who would listen, about some person on the bus who he imagined was his enemy. I'm not sure which passenger it was, but he was quite agitated. I tried as best as possible to ignore him, but I also made sure the driver was aware (we were both sitting in the front) and I very discretely made sure my pepper spray was in my hand...just in case. He finally exited the bus without incident. Both he, and Sandeen, have lost touch with reality. Fortunately, as someone who knows Sandeen pointed out this morning, Sandeen is 350 miles away.
What I will do is continue to speak out, and draw attention to Sandeen's foolishness. And that foolishness includes the fantasy that he can control me.
Update: Well, it seems that Mr. Sandeen chose to update his article, so I guess I should correct his new lies:
Now, Sandeen starts off by claiming to have been cyberbullied, and cyberstalked three times and offers links (note, links as in plural) to document this. Oddly enough, they are all the same link. I don't know if he had simply become so angry he was not thinking, or if he thinks his readers are that ignorant. He then says something that shows just how insane he really is...
I now understand that people I’ve never met in the brick-and-mortar world actually have despised me enough to have seriously planned, and in one case actually accomplishing, real harm to me in the brick-and-mortar world.Okay... Well, what actually happened was there was discussion of preventing Sandeen from attempting to, and then actually committing a criminal fraud that he had bragged he was going to do. He basically lied to a court and claimed he had changed his physical sex. He has not. But having said the above, he goes on to tell, in detail, how he tried to cause me real harm. He wanted, in his mind, to have me fired from a position he imagined I had. Actually, I was never a "staff member" of my church. I was, for a while, the editor of the church newsletter. I did my turn, and now it is someone else. Sandeen's little harrassment had nothing to do with that.
Hmmm, let's look at that definition of cyberstalking he posted.
Sending multiple e-mails, often on a systematic basis, to annoy, embarrass, intimidate, or threaten a person or to make the person fearful that she or a member of her family or household will be harmed. Also called e-mail harassment.In another words, exactly what Sandeen brags about doing. And what Sandeen is clearly hoping others will follow his example and do. And again, Sandeen admits to this...
I wanted the ministers at her church to know how one of their lay leaders was acting outside of the church towards people the church was supposed to be welcoming towards, so I wrote the church — and as I said before, I cc’d her on that email. I did nothing behind her back.Sounds like he wanted to make sure I was annoyed, embarrassed, and/or intimidated.
Let's compare here... I write a blog about issues affecting transsexuals, which includes the silliness pushed by transgender extremists like Sandeen, among others. Sandeen is very active in pushing an agenda that I rather vehemently oppose. I express my opinion on these issues. Further, my blog welcomes anyone who wants to comment, and has only one rule...respect privacy. The only people I have ever blocked have been those who attempt to engage in the sort of harassment that Sandeen is guilty of. Granted, the one time that Sandeen attempted to comment here, his post went to spam, which I was not even aware had been added in an update, and I did not see it until long past the day it was sent. Sandeen tends to prefer posting drivel of the sort we see here, from blogs that are heavily censored.
Now, Sandeen goes on to try to defend another of his attempts to intimidate me. He threatened to use some photos that were obtained by "Willow" Arune through deceit and provided to a vicious cyberstalker, the one who prompted Sandeen to contact my church. This person also contacted Suzan Cooke. To Cooke's credit, she declined to engage in such behavior, having more ethics than Sandeen. Ironically, Cooke does not brag about how she is so like Martin Luther King, Jr.
Jennifer claims I don’t own the copyright of my image; she claims it’s owned by the Huffington Post.Actually, no. Sandeen wrote me, and demanded I remove the photo. I declined to be censored by Sandeen (do you think Sandeen, or Mr. "Cristan" Williams, would agree if I demanded that they take down the private information that Sandeen has posted?). I pointed out that the photo had no copyright, and besides, Sandeen himself had made it public. Mr. Williams has copied content from my blog, without permission (not just quotes, but graphics as well). It is called, "fair use." Sandeen, by the way, has gone far beyond that here. He pointed out that the web page said "Copyright, Huffington Post" and I responded, "You are not the Huffington Post." I never said that the items where owned by them. In fact, I said the opposite.
Now, for example, I have no idea how Sandeen got the photo he used in his post. It is one taken of me some years ago, by a guy I dated a couple of time, and was used by me in various places. It is not one of the one's Arune stole (hey, unlike some people I prefer truth).
Now, as to Sandeen's "meat puppeting" (funny, given I never mentioned that term...) that is kind of obvious. His columns rarely rate more than a few comments. Rather suddenly, there seemed to be a chorus of very similar remarks, including a number from a supposed radical feminist who attacked me and another transsexual, including as Sandeen puts it, misgendering us (funny, Sandeen never said a word) but this person defended Sandeen who has also cyberstalked a number of lesbian women. Perhaps I am mistaken, but I will go with Occam's Razor on this one...
A few final thoughts...
I am supposedly obsessed with Sandeen, but which of us put what was obviously quite a bit of time and effort into searching the Internet for detailed information on someone? What I write about Sandeen is based on reading his posts on LGBT Weekly, and Pam's House Blend. And more recently, Twitter. Hmm, folks be warned...reading Sandeen's public writings is stalking him in his twisted mind. I actually started my blog, largely in reaction to his, and other transgender extremists efforts to hide dissent.
I would welcome anyone to my church, and in fact, we have had transgender people visit. Funny thing...I generally don't take political issues to church with me. And that is, really, what this eventually is. A political disagreement. Sandeen wants to rend asunder the fabric of society. I oppose his efforts to subvert gender. He just takes it a bit too personally. And that is just his reaction to my speaking out against his ridiculous demands for society. As to what else I might do, that is none of his business as it does not directly involve him. Suffice to say, I won't be donning a uniform I am not entitled to wear (he mocked women, and the US Navy) and chaining myself to the White House fence. Or otherwise making a public fool of myself. Unlike him, I do not seek, or appreciate attention.
I will no more pander to Sandeen's delusions than I would those of the gentleman who I had the misfortune to have sit next to me on the bus the other day. He started ranting, to anyone who would listen, about some person on the bus who he imagined was his enemy. I'm not sure which passenger it was, but he was quite agitated. I tried as best as possible to ignore him, but I also made sure the driver was aware (we were both sitting in the front) and I very discretely made sure my pepper spray was in my hand...just in case. He finally exited the bus without incident. Both he, and Sandeen, have lost touch with reality. Fortunately, as someone who knows Sandeen pointed out this morning, Sandeen is 350 miles away.
What I will do is continue to speak out, and draw attention to Sandeen's foolishness. And that foolishness includes the fantasy that he can control me.
Update: Well, it seems that Mr. Sandeen chose to update his article, so I guess I should correct his new lies:
I think I need to make a point one more time because Jennifer is still imagining that I’m conspiring with others to cause her harm. Specifically, I’ve never conspired with someone named Willow to take any coordinated action against Jennifer. In general, I’ve never done any conspiring with anyone at all at any time whatsoever in any matter that relates to Jennifer Usher. As much as she may believe I have engaged in some coordinated conspiracy to cause her harm, she’s absolutely wrong in that belief.This, of course, is a classic straw man argument. I did not say that Sandeen was "conspiring" with anyone. To repeat, some time back, a particularly nasty cyberstalker sent messages to several bloggers trying to get people to attack me by contacting my church. He was hiding behind anonymous servers, and would not do his own dirty work. I suspect he feared legal action. Suzan Cooke posted about this,and how she would not go along, Only Sandeen actually, as far as I know, was the only person stupid enough to actually do what was asked. The person cyberstalking me was not Willow Arune, though Arune was a supporter of that person's efforts. It was hardly coordinated, more of a clumsy scheme by a person who had previously been obsessed someone in Canada. The person has apparently since disappeared. I don't know if they have died, been imprisoned (there is reason to believe this person had a history of criminal behavior in Nevada, or perhaps finally got on some serious anti-psychotics.
Sunday, April 21, 2013
Reality versus Fantasy...
Well, it appears, at least for the moment, that another Internet flame war is over. As some may know, I occasionally comment in Mr. "Autumn" Sandeen's posts on LGBT Weekly, the local LGBT magazine in San Diego. Mr. Sandeen seems to be their token transgender kook (most major LGBT publications have one, usually posted online, but not in the actual publication). This week, he did another whiny post about the Michigan Womyn's Music Festival. Apparently, the "men in dresses" crowd is determined to force themselves on the lesbians separatists who attend this event.
Usually, Mr. Sandeen tends to ignore comments made to his posts on that site. For a while, they were supporting his usual heavy handed censorship, but something changed. It appears that they decided that pretty much anything goes. A few commenters have actually, and quite accurately, referred to him using male pronouns without being banned. Now it appears that Mr. Sandeen decided to take advantage of this in order to, shall we say, "fight back."
Usually, Mr. Sandeen tends to ignore comments made to his posts on that site. For a while, they were supporting his usual heavy handed censorship, but something changed. It appears that they decided that pretty much anything goes. A few commenters have actually, and quite accurately, referred to him using male pronouns without being banned. Now it appears that Mr. Sandeen decided to take advantage of this in order to, shall we say, "fight back."
The problem, of course, is that Mr. Sandeen wants to be the "transgender MLK." He regularly, including in this week's article, tries to make that connection, and of course, winds up making a mockery of Dr. King and his philosophy. But in order to maintain his "facade" he has to avoid showing his true nature as much as possible. So, apparently, Mr. Sandeen brings in support. That, or he has more than a few sock puppets.
Oh, and a couple of other points that should be addressed. Sandeen tries to claim that I am obsessed with him. Actually, he posts more than most, so he gets written about more than most. Of course, Suzan Cooke has made the same claim... And Sandeen has commented about the difference in word counts between me and him, as well as the number of comments I posted. I simply responded to every bit of silliness thrown at me. I have no doubt that had I ignored even one of them, the claim would be made that I was "bested."
One of those he called upon, is Mr. "Cristan" Williams, who repeated the outrageous claim made on Transadvocate that Janice Raymond is responsible for at least 50,000 deaths. That article was written by Zoe Brain, who is infamous for claiming that he spontaneously, without medical intervention changed from a male to a female. A rather insane claim, to say the least. Mr. Williams seemed to be trying to argue that the "radfems" have to be beaten into submission to prevent further deaths, or something like that.. Here is part of my response to his comment:
I could be wrong, but the whole mess that resulted from one comment had the feel of a very organized effort. I suspect Sandeen invited some people (he has already done that on a smaller scale) hoping to bury me in comments. Didn't quite work very well for him.... As it was, he pulled just about every trick in the book... I imagine he thought I would whither in the face of a massive load of absurd rhetoric. When that did not work, the insults started. As I have pointed out, my identity is quite secure thank you. Repeating lies started by a cyberstalker is not going to scare me off. Anyone I care about, knows better, and anyone who believes that crap...well, I could care less.
Of course, the hilarity continues.... Sandeen was having a hissy fit on Twitter...and she brought in some old faces...
And a new face....who has some incredibly stupid things to say....
So, let's see....
If they can't refute an argument.....
They will try to bury you in comments....
If that doesn't work.....
They resort to insults....
And when that fails.....
They call you a troll.
Yes, such is the classic transgender approach to reality.
Update: And then they resort to word count flames...
Yeah, go figure...Sandeen is now comparing the number of words I have posted, versus the number he has posted. Hmmm, doesn't he know, women tend to be more verbal than men. Perhaps he might take that into consideration! Well, in any case, he can update his word count, and whine even more.... ROTFL!
Update: It appears that Sandeen went a bit too far. This morning, he had posted two more comments on his post, basically postings of two tweet he had made, which were attacks on me, and which mentioned me by name (which I prefer to keep private). I responded, and pointed out that he has a habit of attempting to out women against their will. Both posts, and my responses were removed afterwards. I kind of wonder if Sandeen did it, to cover his tracks, of if the people at LGBT Weekly didn't like his behavior. Most curious....
Oh, and a couple of other points that should be addressed. Sandeen tries to claim that I am obsessed with him. Actually, he posts more than most, so he gets written about more than most. Of course, Suzan Cooke has made the same claim... And Sandeen has commented about the difference in word counts between me and him, as well as the number of comments I posted. I simply responded to every bit of silliness thrown at me. I have no doubt that had I ignored even one of them, the claim would be made that I was "bested."
One of those he called upon, is Mr. "Cristan" Williams, who repeated the outrageous claim made on Transadvocate that Janice Raymond is responsible for at least 50,000 deaths. That article was written by Zoe Brain, who is infamous for claiming that he spontaneously, without medical intervention changed from a male to a female. A rather insane claim, to say the least. Mr. Williams seemed to be trying to argue that the "radfems" have to be beaten into submission to prevent further deaths, or something like that.. Here is part of my response to his comment:
Now, beyond that, we slip the bounds of reality, and well….I love a good conspiracy theory….but this not one. I mean, really….this bit of histrionics, which is a recent invention of Williams, and a certain person from Australia who claims to have “spontaneously” changed from a man to a woman (seriously folks, I am NOT making this up) is quite hysterically funny. Funny, I never once encountered this force reparative therapy, nor have I ever heard of such an effort. Perhaps it was super, duper top secret and known only to the secret lesbian separatist cabal…. Known racists? Funny, but since the 1950′s, transsexuals have been accessing medical care without that much trouble. I know when I started in the early 1990′s, I had no trouble at all, and I was in the Deep South (any deeper, and you would be in way over your head). Yeah, I suppose it is possible that a group of extremists might have advocated legislating “trans folk” out of existence. I remember a lot of radical groups that have advocated a lot of laughable ideas. Let’s see, at one time or the other, I have heard of groups who want to give the country back to Native Americans, of a group that wanted to force all white people out of the states that formed the Confederacy and create an exclusively African-American nation, of people who want to ban the consumption of meat, of people who want to execute anyone who is gay, that men should be allowed to invade women’s shower and locker rooms and that women should accept then as “women with penises”…the list could go on, and on. For the most part, sane, rational people learn about such ideas, recognize them for what they are…the rants of crackpots, hope the person does not become violent (like the guy who got it in his head that there is a black market in human body parts and then possibly sent ricin laced letters to a senator and Obama) and get on with our lives. Oh, we might speak up if the person gets a bit of attention, but we generally seem them as the kooks that they are.
Anyway, thanks for a good laugh….I guess Mr. Williams had no answer to reality, as his next response was to fall back on an argumentum ad hominem, the logical fallacy of attacking the person and not their position. That is Mr. Williams' standard practice when he cannot defend a position (which is not at all uncommon).
I could be wrong, but the whole mess that resulted from one comment had the feel of a very organized effort. I suspect Sandeen invited some people (he has already done that on a smaller scale) hoping to bury me in comments. Didn't quite work very well for him.... As it was, he pulled just about every trick in the book... I imagine he thought I would whither in the face of a massive load of absurd rhetoric. When that did not work, the insults started. As I have pointed out, my identity is quite secure thank you. Repeating lies started by a cyberstalker is not going to scare me off. Anyone I care about, knows better, and anyone who believes that crap...well, I could care less.
Of course, the hilarity continues.... Sandeen was having a hissy fit on Twitter...and she brought in some old faces...
Monica Roberts Truth be told, I pretty much stopped reading Mr. "Monica" Roberts crap because I realized it was a bad combination of Ebonics, racism, and pretty much the same rants repeated over, and over, and over, and over....occasionally punctuated with his self-aggrandizement about some award he got. In short. BORING!@AutumnSandeen@cristanwilliams She was hatin' on me for a while until she discovered I don't play with pseudo cisprivilege chasing fools
And a new face....who has some incredibly stupid things to say....
J. Skyler @AutumnSandeen @transgriot Im sure she was the one on Wired's interview w/ @GailSimone on Batgirl saying "transgender" is a slur.Nope, not me. I hadn't seen the article, and when I took a quick look, and saw the number of comments, I lost interest quickly. But yeah, Mr. Sandeen is quite correct. I do agree. I, personally, would consider it a slur if applied to me. For those who identify that way, no. Of course, the subtlety of that is lost on fools like Mr. Sandeen, and company. Then there was this particular bit of cluelessness...
J. Skyler @Oh dear, I forgot to ask the gender fascists for permission before "identifying." Actually, it has nothing to do with identity. My gender matches my physical sex, so, according to the definition, I am cisgender. Of course, the same, technically, could be said of Mr. Sandeen, and Mr. Roberts, among others. They are clearly male, and clearly men. So, by definition, they would be "cisgender" as well. I do, by the way, I think this J. Skyler person is more than a bit cisphobic.
@AutumnSandeen @gailsimone @transgriot also misidentifying as cisgender knowing that's not the intended use of the term, which is hysterical
J. Skyler @jskylerincFor those who don't speak "tranny" that means I don't believe women have penises and want to keep them. Now, I suppose that "pretending" would be pretty accurate, but I would not call most "deviants." I reserve that term for specific cases, like the guy who was exposing his junk to young girls. But Mr. Sandeen came back just as cluelessly...
@GailSimone @autumnsandeen @transgriot she's a surgical essentialist who thinks anyone who doesn't undergo surgery is pretending/deviant.
Autumn SandeenNope, it has nothing to do with "ideology," pure, or otherwise....
@jskylerinc @GailSimone @TransGriot It's more than that. She even gets on post-SRS folk who she deems to not be ideologically pure.
Autumn Sandeen @transgriot @cristanwilliams I've feed the troll too many times, I fear.Actually, except for occasionally cyberstalking me, Sandeen has pretty much avoided responding to my posts. I guess being humiliated as much as he has been will do that to a fellow.
So, let's see....
If they can't refute an argument.....
They will try to bury you in comments....
If that doesn't work.....
They resort to insults....
And when that fails.....
They call you a troll.
Yes, such is the classic transgender approach to reality.
Update: And then they resort to word count flames...
Yeah, go figure...Sandeen is now comparing the number of words I have posted, versus the number he has posted. Hmmm, doesn't he know, women tend to be more verbal than men. Perhaps he might take that into consideration! Well, in any case, he can update his word count, and whine even more.... ROTFL!
Update: It appears that Sandeen went a bit too far. This morning, he had posted two more comments on his post, basically postings of two tweet he had made, which were attacks on me, and which mentioned me by name (which I prefer to keep private). I responded, and pointed out that he has a habit of attempting to out women against their will. Both posts, and my responses were removed afterwards. I kind of wonder if Sandeen did it, to cover his tracks, of if the people at LGBT Weekly didn't like his behavior. Most curious....
Monday, April 8, 2013
Mr. Sandeen is Cyber-bullying Again
Just a few days after a whiny response to a comment where he claims he has been depressed because he was the victim of "cyberharrassment" Mr. "Autumn" Sandeen is up to his old tricks. This is a behavior he regularly engages in. Now, in accordance with his wishes, I will not quote the rather hilarious email he sent me, but I will also not allow his behavior to go unreported.
Simply put, and I guess who could blame him, he objects to the photo I posted of him. And he made a demand that I remove the photo, which he now tries to claim as copyrighted. Unfortunately for him, he had no such notice on the photo. And even more absurdly, he tries to claim that failure to remove the photo will be taken by him as permission to post copyrighted material from this blog. Such an "assumption" is, totally laughable. Does he really think that such lame threats are going to intimidate me?
And, he further threatened that "quoting" his email would be taken as granting permission to do the same, as well as quoting from other sources, and posting private information about me including photos that were stolen. Unlike the photo I used, which he himself posted, the photo he threatens to use have been mostly posted without my permission. In another words, Mr. Sandeen intends to do what a very vicious cyberstalker engaged in. Another completely ignorant threat. And very possibly illegal. While legally, he has no leg to stand on if I did choose to quote the actual email, I am not going to because it would be considered a violation of netiquette. But legally, I could do so, and he would have no recourse.
I will simply remind Mr. Sandeen that this website carries a very specific copyright notice. He would be wise not to violate it. I don't take kindly to men trying to bully me, or any other woman.
UPDATE: Mr. Sandeen sent me another email, in which he pointed out that the article was "Copyright, the Huntington Post." I simply pointed out to him that he is not the Huntington Post. He further threatens to engage in the same behavior as anonymous cyberstalker (well, anonymous only to a point...I know exactly who it is, but they hide behind anonymous remailers when posting, so I cannot pursue legal action). Stay tuned, this could get interesting. As I pointed out to Sandeen, I don' take kindly to men who try to bully women.
UPDATE #2: I did a bit of poking around after seeing a comment on LGBT Weekly about Sandeen's bullying of Cathy Brennan. It is quite true. The man seems to have no comprehension of how he comes across (not really unusual in transgender men like Sandeen). He has a history of badgering Ms. Brennan. I would find much to disagree her own, but I would never attempt to bully her like Mr. Sandeen does. He has made numerous attempts to force her into emailing him, and such. Mr. Sandeen has no concept of how many women see men, especially women who have had some traumatic experience with a man. I don't know Ms. Brennan's history, but it does appear that Mr. Sandeen could show a bit more sensitivity in some areas, though again, expecting such from an obviously aggressive man is probably a waste of time.
Simply put, and I guess who could blame him, he objects to the photo I posted of him. And he made a demand that I remove the photo, which he now tries to claim as copyrighted. Unfortunately for him, he had no such notice on the photo. And even more absurdly, he tries to claim that failure to remove the photo will be taken by him as permission to post copyrighted material from this blog. Such an "assumption" is, totally laughable. Does he really think that such lame threats are going to intimidate me?
And, he further threatened that "quoting" his email would be taken as granting permission to do the same, as well as quoting from other sources, and posting private information about me including photos that were stolen. Unlike the photo I used, which he himself posted, the photo he threatens to use have been mostly posted without my permission. In another words, Mr. Sandeen intends to do what a very vicious cyberstalker engaged in. Another completely ignorant threat. And very possibly illegal. While legally, he has no leg to stand on if I did choose to quote the actual email, I am not going to because it would be considered a violation of netiquette. But legally, I could do so, and he would have no recourse.
I will simply remind Mr. Sandeen that this website carries a very specific copyright notice. He would be wise not to violate it. I don't take kindly to men trying to bully me, or any other woman.
UPDATE: Mr. Sandeen sent me another email, in which he pointed out that the article was "Copyright, the Huntington Post." I simply pointed out to him that he is not the Huntington Post. He further threatens to engage in the same behavior as anonymous cyberstalker (well, anonymous only to a point...I know exactly who it is, but they hide behind anonymous remailers when posting, so I cannot pursue legal action). Stay tuned, this could get interesting. As I pointed out to Sandeen, I don' take kindly to men who try to bully women.
UPDATE #2: I did a bit of poking around after seeing a comment on LGBT Weekly about Sandeen's bullying of Cathy Brennan. It is quite true. The man seems to have no comprehension of how he comes across (not really unusual in transgender men like Sandeen). He has a history of badgering Ms. Brennan. I would find much to disagree her own, but I would never attempt to bully her like Mr. Sandeen does. He has made numerous attempts to force her into emailing him, and such. Mr. Sandeen has no concept of how many women see men, especially women who have had some traumatic experience with a man. I don't know Ms. Brennan's history, but it does appear that Mr. Sandeen could show a bit more sensitivity in some areas, though again, expecting such from an obviously aggressive man is probably a waste of time.
Thursday, November 8, 2012
Mr. Sandeen Is Cyberstalking Again
I have pointed out, more than once, that "Autumn" Sandeen is a kook, who has engaged in cyberstalking me, sending emails attacking me to my church. Well, he is up to it again, this time trying to harass some lesbian he has it in for;
Check out this article.
I mean, seriously. Sandeen is literally out of touch with reality. He apparently believes, as indicated by his remark on Twitter, that he is "now" a "Woman Born Woman" because he committed a fraud and lied to a judge to get his birth certificate changed. No, he is not a woman, legal or otherwise. And is certainly not a female. FEMALES DO NOT HAVE PENISES. WOMEN DO NOT HAVE A PENIS AND A DESIRE TO KEEP IT.
Again, you can't make this stuff up.
Check out this article.
I mean, seriously. Sandeen is literally out of touch with reality. He apparently believes, as indicated by his remark on Twitter, that he is "now" a "Woman Born Woman" because he committed a fraud and lied to a judge to get his birth certificate changed. No, he is not a woman, legal or otherwise. And is certainly not a female. FEMALES DO NOT HAVE PENISES. WOMEN DO NOT HAVE A PENIS AND A DESIRE TO KEEP IT.
Again, you can't make this stuff up.
Monday, October 15, 2012
Oh Dear...Poor Little "Suzy" is Upset Again
Alas, I guess the truth hurts... Suzan Cooke has posted another rant about me over at "Women Born Transsexual." Oh well... I know Cooke hates having faults pointed out, but it is going to happen from time to time. Not that anyone takes Cooke all that seriously anymore. Except those few transgenders who are eating it up now that Cooke has become one of their staunchest defenders.
In fact, in a bit of irony, the kook who was the first of two recent abusive posters is, so far, the only one who has responded to Cooke's post. I suspect he may also be the fool that was trying to attack me here. I always figured he would be back. Or, it could be a rather nasty troll who has been stalking around the Internet for years.
No, Cooke is, if nothing else, a bit of a coward. Cooke will only respond from a position where Cooke controls the discussion. I have made it clear that Cooke is welcome to post here, but I doubt it will ever happen. Cooke really can't stand up in a fair fight. Unless the odds are stacked in Cooke's favor, Cooke shies away. When Cooke started "Women Born Transsexual," I posted a comment welcoming Cooke to the Blogosphere. Cooke's response was anything but polite. After that, for quite some time, I pretty much ignored what was said there, though I did read it for the occasional laugh out loud moment. Cooke is nothing, if not absurdly funny at times.
Well, I will continue pointing out when Cooke makes some absurd remark. I am really not interested in engaging in a tit for tat with Cooke, but I can tell when something I have said has hit a nerve. As I said, Cooke has gone from being extremely nasty (once calling a post-op who had chosen to stay with her wife a "skin transvestite") to close to being effectively a member of the transgender extremists I refer to as "gender fascists." Granted, Cooke hasn't quite reached the point of insisting that people accept the label of "transgender." But it is getting close. Hey, I am sure Cooke will finally reach the goal of becoming the Alpha Tranny yet.
Oh, and I notice that Cooke hated Aria Blue, and the person who wrote "Enough Nonsense." Granted, the person at "Enough Nonsense" apparently had the goods on Cooke, and pretty much confirmed what I always suspected...that Cooke has some major issues, particularly with insecurity. But I also notice that Cooke did not mention that the person who wrote "Enough Nonsense" was basically blackmailed into shutting down. I wonder if the same thing happened to Aria. And now I wonder, did Cooke perhaps have something to do with it? Probably not, but Cooke apparently has no problem with REAL bullying.
Anyway, it is good to know that I hit a nerve. Cooke is the type who needs to be brought down a notch occasionally. And when Cooke starts slinging nasty insults, you know Cooke has been..... I mean really, "Classic Trannie Skanks?" That is, no pun intended, a real classic. As I said, Cooke is nothing, if not good for a laugh. But, then again, this is the fool who gave the world the silliness of "Women Born Transsexual...," the only term that might top "Womyn Born Womym" as truly absurd.
UPDATE:
I checked in and was not particularly to find that Gender Fascist and Cyberstalker "Autumn" Sandeen has add his two cents worth (and vastly over priced at that) on the subject. Sandeen, who spent TWENTY years in the Navy is claiming he "never really passed as a man." Gee, I wonder where he got that from? It certainly was not a part of his story in the past. In fact, when he first posted photos of himself in his Navy drag costume, he bragged about his twenty years worth of stripes showing "good conduct." Yeah, like he would have lasted 20 minutes in the military if he did not pass as 100% all-American macho male. Uh huh... No, Sandeen clearly picked up on something I have pointed out...that us hated classic transsexuals, who were not lucky enough to have found the means to transition early, did lead horrible lives until we did. Sandeen was a happy go lucky crossdresser. Oh, I am sure he slipped into something frilly when he got the chance, but the rest of the time, you know he was all man, or he would have been run out of the service, and not in the official way. They wouldn't have given him the chance. He would have been begging for a discharge instead of waiting 20 years and then, at the last minute, claiming disability.
Oh, and now Sandeen is trying to play the victim, claiming having someone respond to his stupidity causes him to "trigger." Good grief... We can only hope he actually does do everyone a favor and crawls under a rock and shuts up. Though I admit, I would miss the humor...
Yes, Sandeen and Cooke...two peas in a pod.
In fact, in a bit of irony, the kook who was the first of two recent abusive posters is, so far, the only one who has responded to Cooke's post. I suspect he may also be the fool that was trying to attack me here. I always figured he would be back. Or, it could be a rather nasty troll who has been stalking around the Internet for years.
No, Cooke is, if nothing else, a bit of a coward. Cooke will only respond from a position where Cooke controls the discussion. I have made it clear that Cooke is welcome to post here, but I doubt it will ever happen. Cooke really can't stand up in a fair fight. Unless the odds are stacked in Cooke's favor, Cooke shies away. When Cooke started "Women Born Transsexual," I posted a comment welcoming Cooke to the Blogosphere. Cooke's response was anything but polite. After that, for quite some time, I pretty much ignored what was said there, though I did read it for the occasional laugh out loud moment. Cooke is nothing, if not absurdly funny at times.
Well, I will continue pointing out when Cooke makes some absurd remark. I am really not interested in engaging in a tit for tat with Cooke, but I can tell when something I have said has hit a nerve. As I said, Cooke has gone from being extremely nasty (once calling a post-op who had chosen to stay with her wife a "skin transvestite") to close to being effectively a member of the transgender extremists I refer to as "gender fascists." Granted, Cooke hasn't quite reached the point of insisting that people accept the label of "transgender." But it is getting close. Hey, I am sure Cooke will finally reach the goal of becoming the Alpha Tranny yet.
Oh, and I notice that Cooke hated Aria Blue, and the person who wrote "Enough Nonsense." Granted, the person at "Enough Nonsense" apparently had the goods on Cooke, and pretty much confirmed what I always suspected...that Cooke has some major issues, particularly with insecurity. But I also notice that Cooke did not mention that the person who wrote "Enough Nonsense" was basically blackmailed into shutting down. I wonder if the same thing happened to Aria. And now I wonder, did Cooke perhaps have something to do with it? Probably not, but Cooke apparently has no problem with REAL bullying.
Anyway, it is good to know that I hit a nerve. Cooke is the type who needs to be brought down a notch occasionally. And when Cooke starts slinging nasty insults, you know Cooke has been..... I mean really, "Classic Trannie Skanks?" That is, no pun intended, a real classic. As I said, Cooke is nothing, if not good for a laugh. But, then again, this is the fool who gave the world the silliness of "Women Born Transsexual...," the only term that might top "Womyn Born Womym" as truly absurd.
UPDATE:
I checked in and was not particularly to find that Gender Fascist and Cyberstalker "Autumn" Sandeen has add his two cents worth (and vastly over priced at that) on the subject. Sandeen, who spent TWENTY years in the Navy is claiming he "never really passed as a man." Gee, I wonder where he got that from? It certainly was not a part of his story in the past. In fact, when he first posted photos of himself in his Navy drag costume, he bragged about his twenty years worth of stripes showing "good conduct." Yeah, like he would have lasted 20 minutes in the military if he did not pass as 100% all-American macho male. Uh huh... No, Sandeen clearly picked up on something I have pointed out...that us hated classic transsexuals, who were not lucky enough to have found the means to transition early, did lead horrible lives until we did. Sandeen was a happy go lucky crossdresser. Oh, I am sure he slipped into something frilly when he got the chance, but the rest of the time, you know he was all man, or he would have been run out of the service, and not in the official way. They wouldn't have given him the chance. He would have been begging for a discharge instead of waiting 20 years and then, at the last minute, claiming disability.
Oh, and now Sandeen is trying to play the victim, claiming having someone respond to his stupidity causes him to "trigger." Good grief... We can only hope he actually does do everyone a favor and crawls under a rock and shuts up. Though I admit, I would miss the humor...
Yes, Sandeen and Cooke...two peas in a pod.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
.jpg)
