skip to main |
skip to sidebar
As I have recounted, I have again been subjected to a round of attempted cyberbullying by Mr. "Autumn" Sandeen. But, this i only the tip of the iceberg. If you don't adhere to the approved "transgender kook party line," watch out. I have mentioned the attacks that Mr. Sandeen has leveled at Cathy Brennan, who has also been attacked by numerous other transgender kooks. And now, another of the bully boys, Mr. "Cristan" Williams is having another hissy fit because he, and other boys, are not allowed to visit the infamous Michigan Womyn Who Can't Spell Women Music Festival. Now, let me disclose, right off, I have no real interest in ever going to such an event. Like the vast majority of women, it simply does not appeal to me. But, this has become the Holy Grail for the Men in Dresses crowd. They have fits at the very thought that they are not welcome in that place. And speak of Mr. Sandeen, I recall that he claims that they have to let him into the MWMF because his fraudulently obtained birth certificate proves that he is, and I am not making this up, a "woman born woman."
Yes, the latest to take on this issue is Mr. Cristan Williams, who posted a rant on TransAdvocate, which he now runs. In it, he tries to link the policies at MWMF to transsexuals being denied medical care. This follows an earlier article (that I planned on commenting on, but couldn't stop laughing at whenever I saw it), where one of the kookiest of the kooks, Zoe Brain (who presumably did not need such medical care since he claims he just sort of magically turned into a woman) claims that Janice Raymond caused the deaths of 50,000 transgender people because they committed suicide after being denied SRS, or something like that.
Personally, if some group has an exclusionary policy that, well, excludes me, that's fine. I have no desire to invade, for example, the Pacific-Union Club here in San Francisco. It is a men's only club, and while I will admit to a mild curiosity about what might go on there, I would not remotely consider trying to force my way in. The same goes for the Bohemian Club, and a few others. Sure, it would be interesting to have some insight into the mysterious and supposed conspiracies that are hatched out in the woods up near Monte Rio, California, but trying to force them to let me in does not haunt me like invading the MWMF does the transgender kooks.
Sure, a lot of post-op transsexuals, and maybe even a few men with intact penises manage to sneak in every years, but that is not what the boys are after. They want, as always, to be able to "openly" invade the place. That is, to force the women there to "acknowledge" them as full-fledged women with penises, or in some cases, former women with penises...or whatever.
Why, the very fact that there are a few women up there in the woods in Michigan who have not been beaten into submission to the transgender party line gives these poor boys a case of the vapors... Here is what, Nancy Burkholder, the person who apparently started the who thing has to say about it:
My mind was blank, my body absolutely still as I became aware of the emotional devastation that I felt inside. The events that were going down seemed totally unreal. Nevertheless I found a place of calm inside myself. I found acceptance for my situation, and I could feel the emotional devastation without the devastation overwhelming me.
Now, I will grant, Burkholder claims to have not been aware of the policy, and apparently it was not mentioned in the literature until this person showed up. But seriously, you would think this person had been raped, rather than simply denied admission to a music festival. No, it is not pleasant having one's identity challenged, especially if one really is transsexual, but even if that is the case here, it seems to represent some pretty massive insecurities. I can't speak for everyone, but I am secure enough in terms of who I am that I don't let such things throw me for this big of a loop.
My advice to Mr. Williams, and all the others who whine about this every years is simple. Get over yourselves. Lisa Vogel and her crew don't want you at their private party, and you need to accept that. They don't think you are really women (yeah, she thinks the same about me, but I really could care less) and well, in the case of those most obsessed with the whole thing, I suspect she is probably right. So, go find a bunch of girls who will play with you. I am sure you can find a few who will swallow the lie that women have, and want to keep, penises. But Lisa isn't one of them, and I don't think she is going to give in to your bullying.
Well, well...since Suzan Cooke, aka "Locutus of Borg" has gone off the deep end in defense of "Colleen" Francis, the pervert who has been forcing himself on young girls, the men in dresses club has had to rally to Cooke's defense. Yes, no less gender fascist than Mr. "Cristan" Williams has rallied to the defense of Cooke, and Mr. Francis. Can't leave a fellow pervert to stand alone...
Let's be clear here. This pervert in Washington state is not a pre-op transsexual. He has made clear that he has a penis, and he wants to keep it. And he loves showing it to teenage girls. He is a classic transvestite, who is turned on by the idea of being a "woman with a penis," and goes to the extreme of forcing his penis on others and then suggests that they should "just get over it." And, Williams, a fellow pervert, thinks that anyone who disagrees with this sickening behavior is "under a Klan Fallacy."
Now, let me remind people here of a common tactic of extremists. You compare your opponent to some great evil. If you are right wing, you call your enemy a "Communist." It doesn't matter if they have a connection to communism, or not. You just throw that accusation out there. The idea is they will be so embarrassed they will either fold, and go away, or be caught up in refuting the outrageous accusation. If you are left wing, you compare your enemy to the Nazis (also works for the right wing in some cases), or better yet, the Klan. And that is the dishonest tactic that Mr. Williams has resorted to in his desperation.
Now, here is a man, who claims to be a woman, attacking women, for not wanting to have a man, with a penis, who claims to be a woman, forcing that penis on them. Pervert Francis is engaged in the same basic sort of violence against women that rapist engage in...using his penis as a weapon. Williams, a man, is defending this behavior. What Mr. Francis is doing is an act of violence, albeit a bit less than an outright rape, buy still an act of violence. Just like a "flasher," he is imposing his penis on women. And Mr. Williams, thinks this is just fine, and anyone who doesn't see it their way is a member of the Klan.
Now, in defense, yes, I said defense, of RAPISTS, yes I said RAPISTS, Mr. Williams offers thirty, count them, thirty examples of women who have engaged, according to Mr. Williams, in rape. This is supposed to "prove" that men are no more of a danger to women than, "womym born womyn." Seriously...give me a break. This is the sort of argument that only a man could possibly imagine making. For those who have come here and question why I have the audacity to refer to "Cristan" Williams with male pronouns, and have refused to acknowledge HIS "womanhood"....well, there you have your answer.
Thirty women, compared to how many hundreds, even thousands of men? Yes, one can find examples of anything. I could, no doubt, easily find thirty transvestites who are guilty of any crime, and claim that proves that transvestites are a danger. Shoot, I would be I could find more, say, 300. I could find some arbitrary number of any group, and claim it proves something, and like Mr. Williams, I would be intellectually dishonest.
The fact is, rapists, exhibitionists, child molesters, and such tend to be men. For those thirty women, I would venture that there are thousands of men guilty of rape. Does this mean that all transvestites are rapists? No, of course not. Does this mean that all men are rapists? No, how absurd! Does this mean that women have every right to be uneasy at the presence, of an obvious man, in a place where women have good reason to expect to feel relatively secure, and free from the presence of men? Yes, absolutely. Does Mr. Williams, a man, with no real evidence of actually having a feminized brain remotely understand this? Not remotely. He is "transgender" and he thinks as a transgender, he is above women. They should bow to his demands...
Cooke, I suspect, is more a classic bigot. She has a hatred, an irrational hatred, of a certain class of people, and that clouds her thinking. But Williams goes beyond this. Williams tries to claim that a woman being uncomfortable with the presence of a man in a women's room is comparable to a white woman being uncomfortable with a black woman in the women's room. Now, this might seem, to some, on face value to be a valid argument. It is, however, both dishonest, and without any basis in reality. Being a particular race is based strictly, without question, on genetics. While is it possible, in theory, to alter one's skin tone to appear darker, and even to undergo cosmetic surgery to appear to be another race, this is a bit extreme. But any man can, if it suits him, simply dress as a woman. And for a significant number of men, this is basically what happens. Put another way, we are discussing something reasonably assumed to be congenital and unalterable, with something it is equally reasonable to assume is simply chosen behavior.
Perverts like Mr. Francis, and Mr. Williams choose to behave as they do. A woman who is black, or Asian, or even white, did not likely make a choice. A man, choosing to engage in a certain behavior, such as Mr. Francis, or Mr. Williams, should not be automatically allowed to force himself on women. But, Mr. Williams says if you don't think they should be able to, you are a victim of the "Klan fallacy."
Mr. Williams, simply put, is full of crap. Laughably, absurdly, and totally, full of crap. Seriously, if you take his arguments seriously, you are an idiot. End of story. This is comparable to people who claim that perpetual motion exists, but the government is covering it up. This is comparable to people who claim to have solved some unsolvable math problem. Williams, is, well, a bad joke, and the sad thing is, he is not alone.
Oh, and I am going to call it.... By invoking the Klan, Mr. Williams has, effectively, committed a technical violation of Godwin's Law, and has, simply put, lost the argument on that basis alone. So, the fact that he is a total moron is somewhat irrelevant.
Alas, I guess the truth hurts... Suzan Cooke has posted another rant about me over at "Women Born Transsexual." Oh well... I know Cooke hates having faults pointed out, but it is going to happen from time to time. Not that anyone takes Cooke all that seriously anymore. Except those few transgenders who are eating it up now that Cooke has become one of their staunchest defenders.
In fact, in a bit of irony, the kook who was the first of two recent abusive posters is, so far, the only one who has responded to Cooke's post. I suspect he may also be the fool that was trying to attack me here. I always figured he would be back. Or, it could be a rather nasty troll who has been stalking around the Internet for years.
No, Cooke is, if nothing else, a bit of a coward. Cooke will only respond from a position where Cooke controls the discussion. I have made it clear that Cooke is welcome to post here, but I doubt it will ever happen. Cooke really can't stand up in a fair fight. Unless the odds are stacked in Cooke's favor, Cooke shies away. When Cooke started "Women Born Transsexual," I posted a comment welcoming Cooke to the Blogosphere. Cooke's response was anything but polite. After that, for quite some time, I pretty much ignored what was said there, though I did read it for the occasional laugh out loud moment. Cooke is nothing, if not absurdly funny at times.
Well, I will continue pointing out when Cooke makes some absurd remark. I am really not interested in engaging in a tit for tat with Cooke, but I can tell when something I have said has hit a nerve. As I said, Cooke has gone from being extremely nasty (once calling a post-op who had chosen to stay with her wife a "skin transvestite") to close to being effectively a member of the transgender extremists I refer to as "gender fascists." Granted, Cooke hasn't quite reached the point of insisting that people accept the label of "transgender." But it is getting close. Hey, I am sure Cooke will finally reach the goal of becoming the Alpha Tranny yet.
Oh, and I notice that Cooke hated Aria Blue, and the person who wrote "Enough Nonsense." Granted, the person at "Enough Nonsense" apparently had the goods on Cooke, and pretty much confirmed what I always suspected...that Cooke has some major issues, particularly with insecurity. But I also notice that Cooke did not mention that the person who wrote "Enough Nonsense" was basically blackmailed into shutting down. I wonder if the same thing happened to Aria. And now I wonder, did Cooke perhaps have something to do with it? Probably not, but Cooke apparently has no problem with REAL bullying.
Anyway, it is good to know that I hit a nerve. Cooke is the type who needs to be brought down a notch occasionally. And when Cooke starts slinging nasty insults, you know Cooke has been..... I mean really, "Classic Trannie Skanks?" That is, no pun intended, a real classic. As I said, Cooke is nothing, if not good for a laugh. But, then again, this is the fool who gave the world the silliness of "Women Born Transsexual...," the only term that might top "Womyn Born Womym" as truly absurd.
UPDATE:
I checked in and was not particularly to find that Gender Fascist and Cyberstalker "Autumn" Sandeen has add his two cents worth (and vastly over priced at that) on the subject. Sandeen, who spent TWENTY years in the Navy is claiming he "never really passed as a man." Gee, I wonder where he got that from? It certainly was not a part of his story in the past. In fact, when he first posted photos of himself in his Navy drag costume, he bragged about his twenty years worth of stripes showing "good conduct." Yeah, like he would have lasted 20 minutes in the military if he did not pass as 100% all-American macho male. Uh huh... No, Sandeen clearly picked up on something I have pointed out...that us hated classic transsexuals, who were not lucky enough to have found the means to transition early, did lead horrible lives until we did. Sandeen was a happy go lucky crossdresser. Oh, I am sure he slipped into something frilly when he got the chance, but the rest of the time, you know he was all man, or he would have been run out of the service, and not in the official way. They wouldn't have given him the chance. He would have been begging for a discharge instead of waiting 20 years and then, at the last minute, claiming disability.
Oh, and now Sandeen is trying to play the victim, claiming having someone respond to his stupidity causes him to "trigger." Good grief... We can only hope he actually does do everyone a favor and crawls under a rock and shuts up. Though I admit, I would miss the humor...
Yes, Sandeen and Cooke...two peas in a pod.
.jpg)
