skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Yesterday, during her obsessive round of commenting on my blog, Ms. "Mark" Cummings posted one comment that contained a violation of the single rule I have, and so got deleted. But I wanted to share the bulk of that content with you, because it reveals, quite clearly, the real nature of this person…
Learn this everyone hates you including your own family. You are a delusional low life tranny an ugly one at that. Do the world a favor.
Now, the first line is not remotely true. It is based on something my daughter wrote on what was intended to be a very private online journal she shares with her friends. And it was written during a very difficult time for both of us, that is long past. I am not going to share the details of that time, because I am not going to violate my daughter's privacy. But, since then, we talk regularly, and have spent time together on a number of occasions. I also have three lovely grandchildren, who love me very much. So, Ms. Cummings can lie all she wants, as I have reality.
The second line is laughable, and well, typical of Ms. Cummings' writing style. She claims six years of college…obviously not one that had very high standards for grammatical skills. As to whether or not I am "ugly," well that is a matter of individual taste, but I know more than a few who would disagree…
But it is that last line that I wanted to focus on. It's meaning is quite clear. This comes from a person who tries, quite desperately at times, to present a facade of being a leader in the all too imaginary transgender community. She pontificates regularly on what she perceives as the various faults of support groups, and individuals. The current header on their joke of a blog states…
We are a collaboration of bloggers exposing shameful events, topics, and people that are affecting the entire LGBT Community. Stay up to date with the latest shameful news reports by following us.
Not only is this more than a bit presumptuous, it could certainly be argued that much of he shame is their own behavior… Ms. Cummings has this to say concerning herself…
What we say may not always be the popular consensus, but we speak from our hearts and shed light. Sometimes the light can be bright and not always welcoming. You may not like me, But as I have always said at the end of every video, I love you but remember to love yourself too.
I suppose she should append, "Unless, of course, you have the audacity to disagree with me…in which case, you should just do the world a favor and…"
What this favor is, of course, is suicide. Yes, this sick person is actually suggesting that I take my own life. He has engaged in an ongoing campaign of harassment (which fortunately is laughably lame…) in an attempt, quite obviously, to push me into a suicidal depression. Now, I don't know if this is entirely a creation of his own disturbed psyche, or if he has been urged in that direction by Mr. "Diane" Lask, who has engaged in similar behavior towards those he disagrees with in the past.
But Ms. Cummings should be exposed for the sick person she is...
There is a pattern that seems to play out repeatedly when one deals with transgender extremists. The more they are kooks, the more precisely it plays out…. And in my recent adventures with the Trannymaniacs I wrote about last time, it has played out very precisely.
So, what is the Transgender Kook Triple Play? Well, it works like this…
First, they try to show you the error of your ways. They inform you that you are wrong, and that they want to show you the "right path…" (BTW, all of the weird grammar and spelling mistakes are in the original…just consider everything to include (sic) where appropriate.) They will be firm, but that "only want to help you out." Here is part of what this bunch's self-appointed "messiah", Ms. "Mark" Cummings had to say at the beginning...
Transgender is not meaningless it is who you are and will always be. You can run but you cannot hide. Say all you want, scream from the top of your lungs. But you don't full anyone. Now if you feel the need to think you are a woman and that gives you peace, then by all means wish away. But you are only hurting yourself in the long run. You were not a mistake from the word go, we are here to show the world the true meaning of duality, and to think you can kill who you were, is only an act of delusion.
As I said, a bit firm, but after all, she has to set me straight… But, he tries a somewhat softer approach after I pointed out to him that, no, I really didn't buy into his crap, and was not going to accept his advice…
You can repeat it all you want and believe it. It is your choice, your life, but the world knows otherwise. My life is amazing and I am so at peace, before I use to think like you, and I woke up. You are no more of a woman than a transgender woman who still has her penis. Your penis has been inverted but it still has male written all over it. It is fake, it does not lubricate, it does not self dilate. It is a wound at best, having that does not make you a woman. You were born a guy. You and all of us have a hormonal imbalance that makes us feel, in your case feminine and in my case masculine, but that does not make us the gender we claim we are. No matter what surgery, no matter what procedure. You are not a mistake, you don't need to prove to the world one thing. You were fine the way you were. Now I have nothing against transitioning but knowing why we are doing this and why we have been placed here on earth.
Now, she drags out some classic transgender tropes, but she also tries to be a bit condescending, but also tries to gently set me on the proper path… And I decline to accept her correction…
At this point, Ms. Cummings' "husband," Mr. "Jessica" Cummings joins the discussion…
Actually Jennifer I am post op and had my surgery in April of 2013 just FYI. I identify as a woman but I am proud to be Transgender so your fetish theory holds no water with me. We are all equal unfourtunately some of us that are proud of who we are post real pictures of ourselves and those of us that are ashamed hide behind fake photos such as a cartoon character.
Now, I had pretty much told Ms. Cummings that I was not buying into their crap in no uncertain terms. I was already seeing a bit of what was going on, but I hadn't read enough to know the depths of insanity this group holds.. For example, while I would come to suspect something was amiss, I did not yet know for certain that Mr. Cummings was lying through his teeth when he claimed to be "post-op." Yes, he, like Mr. "Autumn" Sandeen is a post-op eunuch, not a transsexual. And I had not made the connection that he was the "husband" of Ms. Cummings.
Now, he drags out some classic transgender tropes, but he also tries to be a bit condescending, but also tries to gently set me on the proper path… More classic transgender silliness…"shame," "hiding," etc. In their mind, someone who is leading a normal, quiet, and happy life as a woman is somehow actually miserable, ashamed, hiding, and in need of correction.
Of course, when this approach fails to work, the second stage of the Transgender Kook Triple Play is to start insulting the person they are arguing with. As sure as the sun rises, the insults will come out. The break is not always clearly defined, and there is usually some mixing of the two…
I don't care if you agree or disagree with me, I don't need your validity or anyone elses. I am speaking my mind and that I am entitled to do. And yes I have walked my life in both genders as have you and as all other trans people. Glad we provided you with amusement since your lonely ass has nothing else better to do. I am sure dilating gets boring after awhile and since you have not been able to use that expensive man made vagina, I wonder how much regret you actually have and need to boost yourself by saying you are better than us trannies who won't put ourselves through that unnecessary procedure that at best won't be able to satisfy anyone, not even yourself. You did come and throw the first stone, by saying transgender is meaningless therefore, you must understand that we don't take very lightly to snobby transsexual women who are uptight due to lack of sexual pleasure and filled with regrets.
Actually, she clearly does care, and she clearly needs my validity. Now, keep in mind the irony of the statement that she is "speaking my mind and that I am entitled to do," given that she repeatedly informed me that I have no right to not identify as transgender. Now, it should be noted, I never said I was better, and actually said there was no basis for comparison. My position throughout this discussion, including what started the whole mess, was simply to point out that the idea of a "transgender hierarchy" was bogus, in part, because the ones supposedly at the top are not necessarily transgender.
And yes, I said "transgender is meaningless" because, well, it is. It is an artificial, social/political construct that is highly subjective and which has no objective basis. In reality, the only criteria for being "transgender" is if one chooses, of one's own volition, to identify as transgender. Of course, this offends the extremists, who, as much as anything, need numbers. And they wish to use transsexuals as their "beards" to hide behind.
Now, when things really get rough, they bring out their favorite insult, and violate Godwin's Law…
I can't believe these HBS nazis have to be just like the TERF is today. Because that's why their scientific theories are not being taken serious and the proposal of having the term transsexual changed to HBS is thus rejected.
There is a page dedicated to debunking the entire series of claims made by HBS nazis who tried to get a page up on Wikipedia.
Now, at this point, they have effectively lost the argument…but, hey, the funs only starting. I will spare you the endless back and forth of nasty insults. I admit, I was not exactly kind in my responses, but as I have said many times, I don't suffer fools, or bigots, well. And when you are dealing with she extremely foolish bigots…it is not going to be pretty. But the main thing I did was meet their stupidity with facts, and that, of course, just made them madder, and madder, which brings us to the final stage of the transgender triple play…the inevitable end of battle. But first, we should look at a bit of irony…
This band of kooks chose to use the image I have on this blog in their attacks on me. Now, the content of this blog is copyright, by me, and as they say, all rights are reserved. I don't object to "fair use," but copying my artwork and using it as they did is not fair use. Quoting is fair use, but taking an image is not (ironically, because of this, I did find out that some bizarre plastic surgery blog, which is not in English, has actually stolen my image as well. Not much I can do, as I assume it is hosted in China, which does not recognize copyright as a rule…but sort of weird…and a little creepy…). When I notified them of this, they went totally loopy, claiming I was trying to censor them. No, I simply said, "Remove the image you stole." I did not say, "Take down the silly insults you have thrown at me…" or "Remove the outrageous claims you make on your blog…" or even "Stop lying about having had surgery you haven't had…" No, I did not try to censor them…BUT….
Yes, in the classic endgame for a transgender kook, they played the censorship card. Mr. Cummings has this to say...
@ Jennifer we have Sat back and entertained your childish actions on every article. It is getting old. We have yet to censor you and shut you up but if it keeps up much longer I will personally start deleting everyone of your comnents from this point forward. So you can waste your time babbling your hypocritical, disrespectful, and manly comments and I will simply make then disappear. Poof =)
And, after I pointed out the irony of this, in light of them doing an entire blog post on their false claim of being censored (Really, this people have NO sense of irony, no sense of humor, and well, no sense, period….) one of them replied:
Well you getting blocked won't be determined by the amount of farm animals you've f****d, but by the amount of stupidity and hate you put into pixels in these commentsections. I take it you've blocked people on your blog too since you're so privacy sensitive about things you've put into the public domain! Ouch! That had to hurt. (And yes, I did censor the profanity in this one…)
My reply to this one was, quite simply, factual…
ROTFL! Well, I guess you should block me then, since I would never match you on the first (since, as I said, I don't engage in your sexual practices, sir…and if you actually thought, about it, you would realize just how incredibly ignorant AND impossible such a suggestion is) and I am also not going to make stupid remarks, since I clearly disagree with your idiocy. But, as you point out, Blogger (alas) does not have a blocking function. And again, your understanding of "public domain" versus copyright is laughable. Hurt, only in the sense that it always hurts to see someone so completely, and woefully lacking in knowledge.
And I still love the irony of you all whining about censorship, and then threatening it because you realize you are actually losing the argument. Classic transgender mentality.
And, of course, they removed my post…along with another, earlier one, where I pointed out, in response to a similar childish remark suggesting that I live in Texas, and well, engage in what I can only assume is a sexual practice this person is quite obsessed with…he keeps mentioning it) along with the suggest that I should therefore "copyright animals"…
Well, first off, I don't live in Texas, nor do I engage in your sexual practices. I do however understand the difference between copyright law, and patent law. You see, copyright applies to creative works, like writing, art, photographs, and movies. It would not apply to an animal. Patent law would, but only if you invent something sufficiently new. Now, genetic modifications are covered, so it would be possible to patent an animal, but one has to keep in mind that patents are in effect a much shorter time than a copyright. Now, sir, it is obvious that your statement was, as usual, mind numbingly ignorant, but that is to be expected.
Anyway, this has all been fun…I admit a certain guilty pleasure in giving kooks fits…and I could sort of see how it would end…it almost always does, unless someone higher up the food chain prevents it (as has happened at LGBT Weekly where Mr. Sandeen is not allowed to censor like he would like to). I will probably occasionally monitor these kooks, and bring you response to anything truly insane, as I do with other kooks.
Okay, the blog Feministing has yet another whiny, and more than a little creepy, post about how those mean old lesbians will have sex with women born women, and even "trans men," but not with "trans women."
The basic gist of the whole posting, besides the obvious "those mean old lesbians won't have sex with me, and they should be forced to" thing is about how this "disrespects" the gender identity of "trans men:"
It’s incredibly undermining to frame sexuality in a way that lumps these men in with all female assigned folks instead of with cis men. It’s a failure, in the realm of sexuality, to recognize thattrans men’s male identities are just as legitimate as cis men’s. If you’re going to base sexuality on gender, better base it on people’s actual genders.
Okay... Well, first off, I find it rather odd that a "trans woman" is presuming to speak out on the idea that "trans men" are being disrespected...especially when, as far as I am aware, few, if any "trans men" are actually raising this issue.
Second, and more to the point, where is the outrage about all those men, often referred to as "chasers" or "fans" who claim to be "straight" but who not only will only date a "trans women" who have not had surgical correction, but who insist on those "women" performing sex acts that no woman born woman could perform...at least without wearing a prosthetic phallus.
These, uh, "straight men" have been known to dump their, uh, "girl friends" if they have SRS, even after long term relationships. Funny, but I have to wonder, where is the outrage? Where are the cries of how this disrespects the "gender identity" of the "trans woman?"
I have seen Mr. "Autumn" Sandeen post some pretty arrogant stuff. I mean, he loves to style himself as the "transgender" equivalent of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. But he has reached a new low... He is now comparing himself to Private Manning.
Now, I am not interested in debating whether Private Manning is a hero, or a villain. That is not the purpose of this blog. But I will note that Sandeen, before Manning expressed the desire to now be know as "Chelsea" was pretty much on the villain side, and it should be noted, he took a lot of flack for it. Now, he wants to elevate himself to the same level.
In his most recent post on LGBT Weekly, Mr. Sandeen engages in absurd self-aggrandizement as he boasts of how he took what he implies were great personal risks during his exhibitionistic performance at the White House fence in protest of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell." Well, at least that is what he thought he was saying when he posted this delightful Freudian slip:
But, having my belief about my own actions regarding those protests I participated in, I had no illusion that what I was doing was violating the explicit direction of Navy uniform regulations. That regulation states “Members of the Navy and Marine Corps, including retired members and members of reserve components are prohibited from wearing uniforms of the naval service while attending or participating in a demonstration, assembly or activity knowing that a purpose of the demonstration, assembly or activity supports personal or partisan views on political, social, economic or religious issues.” And, I knew there could be serious consequences to violating military law.
I assume what he meant to claim was that he was "aware" that his actions might well result in serious consequences, though what he actually says is the clearly more truthful idea that he knew, quite well, that they simply wouldn't. Simply put, there is no way that the Obama administration was going to send Mr. Sandeen to military prison, or worse, strip him of his military pension. It simply would not be a very smart move politically.
Mr. Sandeen goes on to puff himself up by talking about how he would have faced the same problems as Private Manning, had he gone to military prison (like that was even a remote chance).
To be honest, at this point, I really have to pity Mr. Sandeen. He clearly is desperate to puff himself up, and has reached the point where he is now more than willing to engage in the most ridiculous of self contradictory claims. Two weeks ago, he trashed Private Manning, and now he compares himself to that same person in an obvious attempt to ride the wave of publicity.
Well, it was an interesting morning....
As I announced in my post yesterday, I decided to create a Twitter account for my blog. I did this, in part, because Mr. "Autumn" Sandeen had been attacking me on Twitter, and I figured...I would fight fire, with fire. Or in this case, tweets with tweets. Actually, this story really starts a bit earlier... Now, I have been on Twitter a bit longer...but under a different account, and no, I am not giving out that information. This blog, and transsexual issues is actually a very small part of my life, and I keep things private.
Now, anyone can look at someone's tweets simply by going to Twitter and putting in that person's user name if known. You don't have to join Twitter unless you want to post. In fact, you don't have to be logged in at all. Sort of like reading a blog.... A person can mark their Tweets as private, but that prevents people who are not following them from reading them, and Sandeen actually took this approach for about a day after I published several of his more embarrassing statements. But Sandeen is nothing, if not attention seeking, and he went back public
I had started looking at what Sandeen was saying, after seeing various reposts of some of his more obnoxious behavior against various women who have had the audacity to stand up to the jerk. He can be very abusive, and has a nasty reputation for stalking radical feminist women in Twitter...
When I set my Twitter account up, I followed several people, including Mr. Sandeen. Later, so I added him again. Then, I got a message saying he had blocked me. Okay, I figured...that is his right, and not really surprising. I mean, he is a bit of a hypocritical jerk. I am not going to lose sleep over it. Which I didn't. This morning, I woke up, and went online to check email and such, and a bit to my surprise, I discovered that I now had two followers... Mr. Sandeen, and more laughably, his cat. Yes, Sandeen, apparently in a rather clueless attempt to hide, has an account in his cat's name. So, I figured, okay, I don't censor people, and I followed him again. I also had picked up another follower. I then out up my earlier post today, tweeted about it, and added a couple of tweets mentioning that Sandeen...and his cat were no following me.
About an hour or so later, I went to check Twitter again...and discovered that my account had been suspended for "abuse." Now, this is where it gets interesting. I am not sure how Sandeen managed to pull such a stunt off. I had made all of four tweets. My first was a retweet of something from Cathy Brennan, who I am disappointed to say also blocked me. I am not sure why, as I have not attacked her, and in fact, have defended her.
But hey, again, it is her right. If I somehow offended her, I apologize.
Anyway, had to go through checking off a couple of boxes promising not to do whatever it was I was accused of (which doesn't make any sense, since I looked at the Twitter rules and cannot see what, if anything I violated) and my account is back. Sandeen has, again, blocked me, and was not "following me" but, as unbelievable as this might seem, his cat was still following me. I mean really, is he THAT ignorant? Does he REALLY think he is fooling anyone? In any case, I filed a complaint against him, pointing out that he has attacked me as well (which does not actually appear to be against the rules) and pointing out that he appears to have somehow abused Twitter's abuse procedures. Oh well...it is all very strange, but it is also very typical of Mr. "Autumn" Sandeen and the Transgender Kooks in general. They think nothing of attacking people, insulting them, stalking them, etc...but they react in outrage when they are subjected to mere disagreement.
Yes, I admit, I take great delight in tweaking Mr. Sandeen's rather enormous ego. But, he deserves it. I have no sought to harm him in any way. I do wish someone had filed with the court in San Diego to challenge his fraudulent birth certificate, but that is a bit different. There, he was committing a crime and should have been stopped.
If I ever met Mr. Sandeen in person, I would certain be a bit alarmed. He has admitted to engaging in violence, I would certainly be on guard, and would consider taking steps to protect myself as necessary, just as I would with any man who is known to be violent. But, I would take no steps to harm him unless absolutely necessary.
But one thing is for certain. Sandeen is a hypocrite, and a kook.
Update: Okay, I just got an email from Twitter informing me that "Transadvocate" (I assume that would be Mr. "Cristan" Williams himself, had mentioned me in a tweet. He was complaining to Sandeen and Mr. "Monica" Roberts, the notorious "Trangriot" bigot, that I was "stalking" him. So, now, he is trying to claim that following someone on Twitter is stalking them? So, I guess that would mean that his comrade Mr. Sandeen was stalking me this morning? As was his cat? Well, actually, the cat thing was sort of stalking, but that is another matter.... Weird how the mind of these kooks works. Well, I guess he blocked me...
ROTFL!
.jpg)
