skip to main |
skip to sidebar
When I saw that the Toronto Star had, unsurprisingly, confirmed the likely veracity of the incident involving a naked (and quite erect) transgender man harassing a woman in a YMCA locker room, I wondered how Mr. "Cristan" Williams would react. After all, Mr. Williams has frantically tried to deny that the story happened, labeling it as a lie, a hoax, etc. Oh, he had to admit, somewhat reluctantly, that there was a possibility that the story was true, but even then he buried it under so many "weasel" words, it could easily be missed…
The Toronto Star has published this claim – without noting that the claim is a hoax, or at the very least is an anonymous and unverified claim – twice now.
This is actually a repeat of what is said in an earlier paragraph that referred, quite contradictorily, to the entire story as a HOAX, in a story that repeatedly used the term "hoax" to refer to the entire claim.
Of course, this came after I pointed out that Mr. Williams had no real basis to show that the story was actually false, and was simply making them claim without any real basis. Now, it turns out that the Toronto Star has been able to contact the author…that the YMCA has admitted receiving complaints…and that, it is much more likely that the story is true.
So, how has Mr. Williams reacted? Has he admitted his error? Has he admitted engaging in what basically amounts to a cover-up? Has he faced reality, and dealt with the very real likelihood that a transgender male was parading around a Toronto YMCA, with a full erection, harassing females?
Are you kidding? Of course NOT!
To use his own words, he has "doubled down" on his attempted cover-up.
Of course, Mr. Williams, along with his comrade in lies, Mr. "Autumn" Sandeen, know that the truth is not their friend. They have to hide the truth. They have to perpetuate the illusion that "transgender people" never act in improper ways. Because, quite frankly…
They can't handle the truth!!!!
Those who have been following the strange tale of AB 1266 might remember that I pointed out, back in October, that places like San Francisco and Oakland had actually addressed some of the more extreme problems that might occur with AB 1266. In fact, over at LGBT Weekly I confronted Mr. "Autumn" Sandeen about these issues, and strongly suggested that the transgender extremists might want to urge the state legislature to amend AB 1266 to include such provisions in an effort to head off the possibility of that law being overturned.
Well, it is now January, the petition to overturn AB 1266 is still very much alive, in spite of overly optimistic predictions by transgender extremists (and some clearly underhanded efforts by the Secretary of State to stop it) and, well, things have taken a slightly surprising turn.
The extremists from Pacific Justice Institute have embraced the approach taken by San Francisco.
Think about that for a minute. We were told, over and over, by kooks like Mr. Sandeen, and his fearless leader, Mr. "Cristan" Williams, that there was nothing wrong with AB 1266, that is only implemented the polices already in place like San Francisco, and that there had been no problems. Of course, both of them were, as usual, lying through their teeth. AB 1266 was intended to do exactly what was feared, such as allow students to arbitrarily choose what gender they feel like on a given day, and force female students to put up with males parading around nude in girl's locker rooms.
It seems that Mr. Sandeen is now eating his words, and is actually upset that PJI is taking the reasonable approach to dealing with this issue….
Mr Sandeen is straining out a gnat over the fact that not everyone on the right is willing to embrace "San Francisco" values, and swallowing the camel that, well, transgender males have superior rights to females.
And he is, as has become his practice, badly twisting Scripture to do it.
The article at Transadvocate is laughable, at best.
The whole thing started because PJI has suggest that Florence High School, which is at the center of the controversy over the "Jane Doe" case, adopt the San Francisco Unified School District's approach to dealing with transgender students.
How could Mr. Sandeen possibly find fault with this? Well, simple…Mr. Sandeen latches on to the fact that another, separate, group that is part of the Privacy For All Students coalition that opposes AB 1266 does not share exactly the same view as PJI. That group, Capital Resource Institute, apparently takes a bit more of a hard line on the issue.
Hmmm, so, rather than show a shred of common sense, Mr. Sandeen digs his heels in and has a hissy fit because someone actually is willing to compromise, and well, take a position that Mr. Sandeen should fully accept.
Mr. Sandeen tosses out a bit of Scripture…
The integrity of the upright guides them, but the unfaithful are destroyed by their duplicity. Proverbs 11:3
I think he might want to think long and hard about that one. He is the one being duplicitous here. But then, who would expect anything different?
I've been wondering when one of the extremist transgender bloggers would take on the case of the transgender boy at a Bay Area high school who got himself in trouble for attacking a group of girls he claims were bullying him. Of course, Mr. "Cristan" Williams decided to weigh in, and as might be expected, he is demanding "special rights" for this fellow….
The case is really a simple one. A student, who claims to be a "girl" but who is male, and who is well known in his high school, claims he was bullied by female students for years. (And here we have been led to believe that female students have no problems with boys invading the girl's room in school…whoops.) The boy, who calls himself "Jewlyes" Gutierrez, physically assaulted the girls, leading to a rather nasty altercation that was caught on someone's cell phone. And because Gutierrez decided to use violence in response to verbal harassment, he was charged with battery.
Those are the simple facts. A male student, who claims to be transgender, is verbally harassed, and uses physical violence against the female students who object to his presence in their bathroom. Pretty simple. Now, of course, in the eyes of the extremist transgender crowd, the girls have no rights, and Gutierrez has all the rights. He gets to force himself on them, and when they react, he gets to use violence to "correct" them.
But, he cry will go up, "No, we don't want special rights! We just want to be treated like everyone else…." But when push comes to shove, no, they want special rights. When they are treated like everyone else, they cry foul.
No one should be bullied, but being bullied does not justify violence. That is the real issue here. A male (sorry, but he is) physically attacks females who are calling him names. Sorry, but no, that is not excusable. If he was defending himself from a physical assault, it would be different. But they were not hitting him. He is the one who resorted to violence. And he was a male, hitting a female. Reality may not suit the transgender extremists, but it is past time for them to be brought face to face with it.
Obviously, as previously discussed, the favorite tactic of transgender extremists is to simply accuse anyone who questions the right of men to claim to be "women" and then wave their penises in front of actual women, of hatred. Their second favorite tactic is similar, but slightly different. It is to obfuscate and avoid the real issue.
Mr. "Cristan" Williams, and his comrade in deception, Mr. "Autumn" Sandeen have both had a complete meltdown over some transgender man in Toronto "ogling" a woman in a YWCA locker room. Their issue? The reporter did not do the impossible, and verify that the story was true. So, of course, Mr. Sandeen called YWCAs in Toronto, who stated that no such incident had been reported, and also called the police, who stated the same, and then both he, and Mr. Williams, declared the story a "HOAX!" You can read their silly diatribes here, and here.
The problem is, the journalist in Toronto did nothing wrong, while both Mr. Sandeen, and Mr. Williams are, again, lying through their teeth. Calling this a hoax is a lie, as they have no evidence of that. The lack of evidence proves nothing. In this case, they are claiming that the fact that this was not reported to the YWCA, or the police proves it did not happen. That is simple ignorance. The simple fact is, at best, it would be an open question.
Why do they do this? Because they know, deep down, it almost certainly did happen, but they can't deal with that. So, they make it go away. They hide it. As they always try to hide these things.
They want to create an illusion that all transgender people are good, and pure, and innocent. Because let's face it, the truth is not their friend.
Did a transgender male, parading around in the nude, with a full on erection, really ogle a woman changing in YWCA locker room in Toronto? Possibly, even probably. Do such things happen? Yes, though Mr. Williams and Mr. Sandeen wish to lie and claim that they NEVER happen.
Perhaps a more important question is, why do perverts like Mr. Sandeen, and Mr. Williams want to force women to have to face even the possibility of such things being forced on them?
.jpg)
